Wuhan Scientists Bitten by Bats with Coronavirus

Posted by $ jbrenner 4 years, 3 months ago to News
44 comments | Share | Flag

We all knew that the virus originated from Wuhan Institute of Technology, not some wet market. Here is the video proof.

The video segment was about 39 to 43 minutes into the show. Marc Siegel was the guest. On the video, it starts at 29:19.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The ACE 2 enzyme is also key to understanding why certain pain relievers should NOT be taken if you get COVID. I can't prove it, but it certainly looks like the virus is a failed attempt at using HIV to help make a vaccine against SARS-COV-1.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Video unavailable. Maybe I should look with Firefox. Let me try that. Nope, doesn't show on Firefox either. Editing to add: also tried incognito mode. No joy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kittyhawk 4 years, 3 months ago
    Scientists working in the lab in Wuhan being bitten by wild bats seems like an unbelievable coincidence. It sounds like a superhero backstory.

    I think it's far more likely that the virus was intentionally manmade. Professor Giuseppe Tritto's book "also connects the dots linking the Wuhan lab to France and the United States, showing how both countries provided financial and scientific help to the Chinese as they began to conduct ever more dangerous bioengineering experiments.

    "Although neither American nor French virologists are responsible for the end result … their early involvement may explain why so many insist that the 'chimera' must have come from nature. The last thing they want to admit is that they might have had a hand in it." Source: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...

    Were the unfortunate bat-bitten lab workers also coincidentally attacked by a wild pangolin? What are the odds of that?!?! "However, the coronavirus isolated from pangolin is similar at 99 percent in a specific region of the S protein, which corresponds to the 74 amino acids involved in the ACE (Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2) receptor binding domain, the one that allows the virus to enter human cells to infect them. By contrast, the virus RaTG13 isolated from bat R. affinis is highly divergent in this specific region (only 77 percent of similarity). This means that the coronavirus isolated from pangolin is capable of entering human cells whereas the one isolated from bat R. affinis is not." Source: https://consortiumnews.com/2020/03/20...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I really don't have time for games anymore, but it is not long before we get de-platformed.

    My kids used to watch a TV cartoon called Avatar: The Next Airbender. There were a couple of episodes in there regarding Ba Sing Se (particularly the brainwashing of a teenager in Lake Laogai) that are coming to mind. My head hurts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Both good games with similar mechanics just different worlds. I played (and still play) D&D though I'm more of an old-school guy. 4e and 5e almost require a computer to run; there are so many rules and modifiers it makes my head hurt. I also played TMNT and GURPS.

    I'm betting that the next few years my RPG days are going to change. I'm going to be role-playing how life would be like if we were free. :(
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I used to play Nethack, a variant of Dungeons and Dragons, years ago. In that game, eating a bat would at minimum make you "bat crazy" like a cursed potion of confusion, but also would generate a check against poison resistance. How well games mirror reality. ;)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ gharkness 4 years, 3 months ago
    That video needs to go on bitchute.com. It "has been removed by the uploader." Aka, YouTube took it down and is blaming it on whoever loaded it.

    So, can't see it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 4 years, 3 months ago
    Anyone who did a quick reality check could debunk the notion that the wet market was the source.

    #1 The Chinese don't eat bats. Indonesians and other Far East nations, but not the Chinese. (Wuhan is the most technologically advanced city in China with a high proportion of middle class citizens.)
    #2 The closest horseshoe bats to Wuhan are 800 miles away. Can we say cost of transportation?
    #3 The Wuhan Institute of Virology is 1/2 mile from the wet market.
    #4 Horseshoe bats were being studied at the WIV by the head researcher because they carried an example of a coronavirus which was destroying their population.
    #4a The horseshoe bat coronavirus could not infect other species. At least until the head researcher substituted the envelope or S-proteins to allow it to infect humans... She even published a paper on her efforts. (I read it.)
    #4b The horseshoe bat coronavirus also was not particularly dangerous to humans even after 4a. The researcher published another paper, this one about combining the RNA of other nasty virii into a coronavirus. Chinese scientists who were first to produce a gene sequence of the virus were astonished to note that there were RNA genes identical to those found in HIV and ebola - statistical impossibilities.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This example is more like, "You can fool many people all of the time, and those you can't, you intimidate, "re-program", and/or eventually eliminate. Re-programming was yesterday's word of the day.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't know if this was released by the CCP or by a "whistleblower", probably the latter. Such a whistleblower will "disappear" soon.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago
    Are they admitting they developed it and infected the bats, or are they claiming it was an accidental bite
    while they were gathering samples and trying to develop it? Either way it was their fault for doing that
    development and releasing it.
    We want our $200 trillion in damages.
    Wait, would that be slavery or equitable damages?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 3 months ago
    You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo