14

As Predicted, WHO Changes Inaccurate "False-Positive" Testing Policy to reduce COVID "Cases" By 90% One Hour After Biden Inauguration

Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 3 months ago to Politics
33 comments | Share | Flag

I’ve been saying it for months. In fact, I documented it on October 27, 2020, for posterity: As soon as Joe Biden became president, the narrative on COVID-19 would change. Today, the World Health Organization (WHO) proved me right.

In August of last year, The New York Times published an article stating that as many as 90% of COVID-19 tests in three states were not indicative of active illness. In other words, they were picking up viral debris incapable of causing infection or being transmitted because the cycle threshold (Ct) of the PCR testing amplified the sample too many times.

Labs in the United States were using a Ct of 37-40. Epidemiologists interviewed at the time said a Ct of around 30 was probably more appropriate. This means the CDC’s COVID-19 test standards for the PCR test would pick up an excessive number of false positives. The Times report noted that the CDC’s own data suggested the PCR did not detect live virus over a Ct of 33. The reporter also noted that clinicians were not receiving the Ct value as part of the test results.

Yet a PCR test instruction document from the CDC that had been revised five times as of July 13, 2020, specified testing and interpretation of the test using a Ct of 40. On September 28, 2020, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases from Jaafar et al. had asserted, based on patient labs and clinical data involving nearly 4,000 patients, that a Ct of 30 was appropriate for making public policy. An update to the CDC instructions for PCR testing from December 1, 2020, still uses a Ct of 40.

Shortly before the New York Times article was published, the CDC revised its COVID-19 test recommendations, saying that only symptomatic patients should be tested. The media went insane, and Dr. Fauci went all over television saying he was not part of the decision to change the testing standards:

“I am concerned about the interpretation of these recommendations and worried it will give people the incorrect assumption that asymptomatic spread is not of great concern. In fact it is.”

PREDICTION: Joe Biden Would Manage COVID-19 in One of Two Ways — Both Should Infuriate You
So, of course, Fauci had spoken, and the guidelines went back to testing everyone, all the time, with an oversensitive test. The idea that asymptomatic spread was a concern as of August was just one of many lies Dr. Fauci told. At the beginning of the pandemic in late January, he said:

The one thing historically that people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.

There is not a single study or meta-analysis that differs from Fauci’s original assessment.

Today, within an hour of Joe Biden being inaugurated and signing an executive order mandating masks on all federal property, the WHO sent out a notice to lab professionals using the PCR test. It said:

WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

This translates to “in the absence of symptoms, a high Ct value means you are highly unlikely to become ill or get anyone else sick in the absence of very recent exposure to an infected person.” Dr. Fauci knew this in July when he said that tests with a Ct above 35 were likely picking up viral debris or dead virus. Even at a Ct of 35, the incidence of virus samples that could replicate is very low, according to Jaafar et al. The only state I know that requires reporting the Ct with every test is Florida, which started this policy in December.

Biden Taps Transgender Health Official With Horrifying COVID-19 Nursing Home Record
The WHO went on, stating:

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

In short, a positive PCR test in the absence of symptoms means nothing at a Ct of higher than 30, according to the experts interviewed by the New York Times and according to Jaafar et al. Yet positive tests is the number CNN loves flashing on the screen. If the percentage found by the Times in August holds, there have been approximately 2.43 million actual cases to date, not 24.3 million. There is also no way to calculate the deaths from COVID-19 rather than deaths with some dead viral debris in the nostrils.

What I have referred to as the “casedemic” since September will be magically solved just in time for Joe Biden to look like a hero. For doing absolutely nothing. Do not tell me there is not a politicized deep state in these health agencies. Do not ever tell me I need to listen to Dr. Anthony Fauci again. And every business owner who has been ruined because of lockdowns due to a high number of “cases” should be livid. Any parent whose child has lost a year of school should be furious.

None of this was for your health. It was to get rid of Orange Man Bad.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 3 months ago
    If you recall, I predicted this would happen, because the purpose of COVID is now gone (assuming we don't believe Kal-El shows up and saves us over the weekend).

    Some other people are going to figure this out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah my X2 was there in '70! I wouldn't let the doctor bring him home. He only had 5 months to go. 2nd time around.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Eisenhower and Reagan in 3 of those 4. In '70 the fed gov was so wrapped up in lying about Viet Nam they didn't have time to do it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 4 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It will revert to lots of flu and common colds. Death rates will decline only if the economy is re-opened (since they are about normal level anyway)- and the Trump legions don't botcott all the big companies who cheated Buy-dem into office.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ BobCat 4 years, 3 months ago
    Thanks FFA for finding this. The informed WE of the Gulch have known the tests were bogus and being manipulated to spread fear amongst the sheeples for many, many moons. They have a vax to sell and peddle so don’t expect to see this in the mainstream media. Wait for all the talking, brainless heads to rebuke the story if it ever gets out. Grab the popcorn and wait for more lies. Gates and his minions are no doubt working on more smoke and mirrors...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 3 months ago
    Hey, FFA. Doncha think it's odd we didn't all have to get vaccinations after having the flu from 1957, 1959, 1970, and 1983? Nobody cared about us. Boo Hoo!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 4 years, 3 months ago
    Thank you Freedom for keeping an ear to the rail on this. I suspected from the beginning. Now I know that suddenly this will go “Poof” and Biden will have cured COVID. Even if he didn’t.
    This should also be known as “How to perform Quantitative Easing without looking like you’re Quantitative Easing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 3 months ago
    My PCP (who was Chief of Staff of one of Houston's largest hospitals) does not trust the testing. My Endocrinologist does not trust the testing either.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo