Calif. judge allows 2019 shooting victims and families to sue gun manufacturer, retailer | One America News Network

Posted by $ AJAshinoff 3 years, 9 months ago to Politics
40 comments | Share | Flag

Here is comes. If they can't strip the 2nd amendment then they will use the market to starve the industry into submission or cease completely.

A gun doesn't travel itself, load itself, aim itself or fire itself.


All Comments

  • Posted by term2 3 years, 9 months ago
    Its time to invent the replacement for the gun that can be 3D printed by anyone, made from commonly available materials, and could do the job of a gun, at least at close range for personal protection.

    Maybe some sort of personal force field capable of deflecting bullets or attackers. Something that would be difficult for the government to outlaw.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Aurum79 3 years, 9 months ago
    Is Smith & Wesson publicly held? If so, the stockholders should band together and sue that synagogue, take all of its assets, and force them to shut down.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by amhunt 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    To shoot bad people that are trying to hurt you or trying to steal or damage your property?
    However, in Kalifornia the government will likely send more bad people to hurt your or steal or damage your property -- so be prepared!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 3 years, 9 months ago
    When hospitals are paid thousands to list some other cause of harm or death, other than vaccine, the truth will not come out. Only Britain has made public autopsies on early vaccine recipients available, and they showed the spike cellls in multiple organs, and death by the natural immune system attacking those organs. That is because of they way the vaccine sets the body up to kill itself.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Russpilot 3 years, 9 months ago
    Woo hoo!!! I am going to sue my tableware manufacturer for making me fat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Snakecane 3 years, 9 months ago
    Oh, that's good news! (Sarc) Now, if a vehicle strikes me, a pedestrian, I can sue the auto manufacturer for making and selling such a dangerous device. Knife manufacturers look out! As for police officers, they should never be given weapons which could, all on their own, jump out of holsters and kill people. Someone should sue the schools where the judge got his "education".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by VicW 3 years, 9 months ago
    In order to purchase a gun from any dealer a form must be filled out and submitted to the FBI for approval. Should they be able to sue the FBI too? A few years back I purchased a shotgun from a gun show and got delayed on approval. I was not able to take possession for a week due to a FBI computer issue.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And the prisons are filled with people who were prosecuted for laws that have no victim (other than the prisoners.)
    Good for the prison business!
    I am for free markets and free will.
    Imprison the politicians and repeal all laws that don't obey the exact specific limits of the constitution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 3 years, 9 months ago
    How about we give California back to Mexico? Other than the wine industry what good is California?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by evlwhtguy 3 years, 9 months ago
    You know...this banning guns business...if it will work so effectively, why don't they ban illegal drugs. Drugs are a serious problem and it would be good if we didn't have all the drug abuse wrecking peoples lives. Oh...I forgot...illegal drugs are "Banned" but unaccountably they still get in the country from all sorts of far flung places. Maybe this banning business doesn't work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Commander 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks Big Gun!
    Without getting drawn into the rhetoric of "The Source", I stayed "principled". Over the past 15 months I've endeavored to clarify and simplify objective thought and iteration into lay terms. Quite a process. The relief from living in a large metro area has done wonders for my clarity and sanity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Commander 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I love you too, baby, it's ok, this will pass.

    Now, if you are so inclined, you may venture into the realm of objectivity through one of Ayn's most profound essays: The Objectivist's Ethics. This is an offered choice, not a demand or "telling" you what to do. This is an offer to self direct your mind perception to conceptualization....your choice to discover or not.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "When assumption is embraced or utilized it is known as arrogance. ..." Nicely expressed here.

    How it can be assumed everyone here has a subscription to "The American Rifleman" is a bit of a stretch as well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    then stop being arrogant and telling others how to act
    for someone to claim to not have heard of an AR-15 is not credible, if paying ANY attention to the news over the last 10 or more years
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Commander 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Objectivity requires the acknowledgement of benign ignorance.
    One who has had no exposure has no perception and therefore no conceptualization of any given "subject". The malignant partner to benign ignorance is assumption. When assumption is embraced or utilized it is known as arrogance.

    Arrogance is the context of "I am right and you are wrong" regardless the exploration of either parties exposure and conceptualization. Dismissive would be the "operative" I would choose.

    In context to AR-15; I'd not been exposed to this until maybe 5 years ago. And I am an accomplished marksman. What brought this to my attention was my acquisition of a home self-defence piece of armament. Living in So. Minneapolis had it's ....... jeopardy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by mhubb 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    sorry, no sale on this topic
    to me user was a sock puppet asking a question LONG answered

    any issue of the American Rifleman has the section of telling how people defended themselves, with AR-15s in some cases
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 3 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I beg to differ, mhubb. The Gulch is a good place to ask questions and receive an answer (education), especially in context of an ongoing discussion. There's even encouragement of such through the "Ask The Gulch!" feature.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 3 years, 9 months ago
    I know, the gun manufacturers and retailers MADE THEM DO IT!...it's a travesty!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo