

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
It doesn't make you one." -Jay Severin.
Gender confusion is a form of mental illness.
An outgrowth of the Liberal agenda.
They are denying God. Good luck with that.
Additionally, morality ceases to exist if there is no purpose to existence. Every choice we make is built upon a premise of action -> consequence. If there is no consequence for poor behavior, there is no disincentive and therefore no reason not to loot. Every sustainable moral foundation depends upon ultimate universal consequence. Don't believe me? Try deriving the Golden Rule or a principle of equality in humanity without it. I can't do it and I've never met anyone else who could. Maybe you could be the first...
"to say that science and religion are compatible is a logical fallacy."
Why? Simply because the leftist elites say so? The Renaissance wasn't devoid of religion, just a break from the artificial constraints of the Catholic Church. Protestantism, however, flourished, as did those inventors and scientists who shook off the shackles imposed by the earth-centric and flat-earthers. The American Revolution was carried out by theists - not atheists.
My favorite quote is from Jurassic Park and emphasizes the necessity for both religion and science: "Yeah, but your scientists were so concerned about whether or not they could they didn't stop to think if they should ." Science without moral constraint brought us COVID. Government without moral constraint brings us communism/socialism/elitism/feudalism and the murders of 200 million people. The why matters - and it matters a lot.
I don't believe in a "malevolent" universe. I believe in a universe of wonder and amazement where we get to choose what kind of people we will be. We get to choose to live according to universal moral laws - or not. And we only have so long to make those decisions and experience the consequences of them. It's a blessing to those who live by universal moral laws that this existence gives way to another: more grand and glorious. It's not such a blessing to those who choose to invent for themselves a selfish (and I use that to mean a "looting" life) because eventually those people will leave this life and have to deal with the consequences which were temporally (one could use temporarily but time doesn't have the same meaning there) delayed.
Continuance of existence is a prime consideration for any sentient being. For the life of me (pun intended) I can't understand the notion that some people have where their existence terminates. Such a belief mocks existence itself IMHO.
I don't believe that science and religion are at odds, either. Science describes the physical world in which we live. Religion covers the purposes for which we live. One the how, the other the why. Both necessary, like two sides of the same coin.
So true. They can't dispute the fact that XY = Male and XX = Female and there's nothing your feelings can do about that.
"They did it to themselves."
My favorite argument from these psychos? When caught in this debate the "trans-women" (men) will answer any point using the term "womanhood". It's a make believe word so that they can sound like their premise isn't total shit...
From the moment of mitosis life begins and so does it's countdown. For arguments sake, lets say everyone, short of mishap, has an expiration date, a drop dead date, after 125 years. I made the assumption that you understood. Physical life, the only live we can absolutely say for certain, our perception and reality, is finite. If its your choice to believe that's all there is to existence, that you one day blink off and are done, more power to you. You have zero way to know that's all there is or to say with certainty that what I believe is wrong based on the limitation of only your 5 senses. Conversely I have no way to know for certain there is anything after life. In different ways we both have faith. I can live with that.
Do watch the video it's an eye opener. It has nothing to do with the metaphysical, only the mentally deficient given undue legitimacy when confronted with factual science.
I could go into who is really valuing life more (I am not denying reason at all), but it's past 1:30 am here and kicking that ball off at this time isn't a good idea.
Matter cannot be destroyed, only changed in form. To blink out of existence entirely denies reason as man is far more capable than other living things on earth.
but it will be ugly
very, very, very ugly
like the Dinosaur killer ugly
i pity you your lack of the ability to look at the world with any sense of honesty and wonder
read Darwin's Black Box for a clue
Load more comments...