None of the Above?
Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 months ago to Ask the Gulch
Would a None of the Above choice be a blessing or a curse?
If a none of the above vote won a majority of the votes, it would clearly show the People's disgust with whom they are forced to vote for.
But then what would happen? A revolution? A new election?
If a none of the above vote won a majority of the votes, it would clearly show the People's disgust with whom they are forced to vote for.
But then what would happen? A revolution? A new election?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
I'm 77 and have found I have trouble remembering stuff fro time to time.
Lately I've had a senior moment recalling the name of a grocery store I frequent and that it's fried oche that I like with a combo order at Church's Chicken.
If I had a brain, I'd be dangerous. So I think I'll be okay. Uh, did I just write "think?"
Trump did fairly well given that the advisors he had, but it wasn't hard to figure out the Chinese and Fauci deceptions. Rand Paul figured it out almost as fast as I did.
the POTUS needs to listen to what he is told and work with that
he is NOT God
he was given that millions would die
he acted on that
and he actions after, sending aid to New York shows what kind of person he is
It would indeed apply to all of them. In fact I think that it must. I also think that it would naturally influence government bureaucracies to be kept as small as needed.
Would your term limits apply to the 3,000,000 Federal Bureaucrats and employees also?
Anyone taking a look at this board can give points if memory serves old dino correctly before becoming a fully posting Gulcher 10-and-a-half years ago.
Can a newbie "-1" to a Gulcher? Don't think I even tried that way back when.
By very early April of 2020, I knew that it selectively targeted the ACE-2 receptor and that COVID was genetically modified to have more arginine amino acids and therefore be more likely to make COVID stick better to connective tissue. By then, I was selling an ultraviolet disinfection device. My company was promptly doxxed by search engines for promoting "disinformation". I was right, and the so-called experts were wrong. Although my wife, a nurse, caught COVID not long after that, I didn't catch it until after being forced to take a shot (not a vaccine) in July of 2020. I did not miss a day of my "day job" of being a professor during COVID, but got over it in two or three days not long before university re-started. There was plenty of evidence that Fauci and the Chinese were lying.
The only person in this forum that might know more about COVID is Abaco.
Since the word "inability" is used I think the answer must be "yes". It indicates that something fundamental is broken. It would literally force the "power wielder's" hand.
All government positions are susceptible to corruption because they necessarily involve the "use of power". Thus I believe term limits must be applied uniformly throughout government (perhaps a maximum of 8 years, like the president). Perhaps these might be a good starting point: 1) Once a government position has been held no further government position may be held, elected or otherwise. 2) Government lobbying is not permitted once a government position has been held. 3) Hired government positions are selected from a qualified candidate list by lot.
you have been told millions could die if you do nothing
Probably so. There IS a line too far....but it seems only the good guys are willing to not cross it.
OUCH. Yeah, I think Trump would see that as "Staining her"... For the same reason he never insults Bidens voters! Just my guess.
But yes, I don't think the job is to answer the questions, because this whole "Accepting the outcome" question is a trick. HOW MANY Republicans SWORE they would support whoever one the Primary. And then DENOUNCED Trump. The IDIOT in OHIO comes to mind. My answer. Just tell them what they want to hear. In the end, an EXCEPTION is just that!
The point of the "debate" was to get out the things he (and Biden too, had Biden been sentient) wanted the American people to know, whether or not it answered a direct question by the moderating parties. Why? Because the questions they asked were nothing special, and that format could have been used (whether it was or not) to ask questions that were prejudicial. Actually I don't remember the questions other than the ones you mention.
I do think he missed a HUGE bet when accused of "having sex with a porn star," not mentioning that not only did he not have sex with a porn star, but if he had, it'd be immeasurably better than taking a shower with his own pre-teen daughter.
Load more comments...