Excellent; Gaetz was a liability

Posted by $ Thoritsu 5 months ago to Politics
58 comments | Share | Flag

Suspect Gaetz or Republicans got what they wanted by getting Gaetz out of the House Investigation. He was a liability as AG. Trump needs a better one.

AP Version:
https://apnews.com/article/gaetz-trum...


All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 4 months, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    A DemonRat can indict a ham sandwich. No one is safe from being vilified by the DemonRats and their tame media.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by RimCountry 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I might be a little late to the party on this, but I've been doing a deeper dive on Ms. Bondi... seems she was very involved in permitting the railroading of George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case... caved to pressure from the BLM-type activists. Basically destroyed Zimmerman’s life, and he still hasn’t recovered to this day.

    There’s also a little matter just hanging out there involving the Deep State… seems there’s an election law violation that was never fully pursued involving a large cash contribution DJT made to Bondi’s re-election campaign during the time when his charities were being investigated down there in Florida. When Bondi won, the investigations by the state were dropped. The Feds could still at any time pick up were the state left off. Leverage. Bondi could be seen as “compromised” or in other words, safe.

    She said herself that she doesn’t intend to “gut” Justice, rather wants to “change the culture”. Sounds like a lot of new posters in the lunchroom to me.

    Just sayin’… Gaetz would have gone in for the kill, and they all knew it. Bondi… methinks they know she won’t… including DJT.

    We’ll see… if both Dems and RINOs gladly confirm, ain’t no sunshine, and nothing gonna change at Justice.

    EDIT: By the way, asking for the resignation of all 93 USAs and replacing them is SOP for all incoming administrations of the opposite party. It's the other 115,000 careerists who need culling.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ok. We need >180ksi yield.

    Ever try HIPing the 3D part after debinding ? We have done this on castings to improve properties and porosity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I presume you mean Hot Isostatic Pressing. I know a little about it, but have never done it. I am doing 3D printing of metals using an 88% metal / 12% poly(lactic acid) composite from The Virtual Foundry, followed by debinding and sintering.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree. You can do system engineering without DOORS et al, but it really helps in the beginning.

    C is better than Pascal, but I don't teach first time shooters with an AR. COBOL is useless. Disappointed my girl, Capt Grace Hooper invented it!

    I learned them all, but in the wrong order: Basic, APL, Fortran, LISP, (tried C, but couldn't get it), then Pascal and it all came together. I wrote my FEA code in Pascal in grad school. The professor told me, "I won't be able to help you with the coding if you do", but you have to do a real project to learn anything, and I was already good at basic coding. That worked great! If I recall correctly I developed some Structs for element information. After Pascal, C came easily, and the brevity and clarity is like a religion. If you look up recursion in the index of the original Kerninghan and Ritchie, it references p77, which is that page in the index! Fantastic. 77 pages to the index of a complete language reference! I recall a book on Diff Eq (I think) by Bode (but I may have it wrong). It was ~150 pages and clear as a bell. Textbooks today are drivel.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I look at computer programming much more for a systems engineering standpoint (What is it that you are trying to accomplish? What are the inputs and outputs?) than from a syntax standpoint. I learned all of those languages at some point.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agree. I wish universities stuck with Pascal for a learning language. It teaches all the flexibility of C, but with structure and data type rigors. FORTRAN is too limiting. Basic is too unstructured. C is too wild-west (but now my preferred language). Java and Python are toys.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo