13

EPA recommends dropping CO2 “endangerment finding” [ending the lie that CO2 is a pollutant]

Posted by freedomforall 1 month, 4 weeks ago to Science
18 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"If CO2 isn’t endangering lives, legally, there’s no reason to outlaw oil and gas
Marc Morano of ClimateDepot calls this the “holy grail” of the climate agenda. Most of the climate policies of the United States depend on “the Endangerment Finding”– so President Trump asked the new EPA head to look closely at it. This is the “finding” in 2009 that CO2 endangers the public, and that in turn means the EPA must regulate this “pollutant”. Thereby becoming the perfect excuse to allow the bureaucrats to regulate cars, trucks, planes, gas stoves and anything from hair dryers to home insulation.

The new EPA head just finished his 30 day consideration and recommends the Whitehouse rewrite the past conclusion entirely."
---------------------------------------------------
One Deep State scam to be ended at last.
What will it cost to educate all the useless idiot college graduates who were brainwashed by this scam?


All Comments

  • Posted by tutor-turtle 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    We face a far bigger danger of low CO2, (we are at close to historical lows now) than foolishly worrying about high levels. (which has helped the planet flourish).
    We all know what BS this scam is.
    Can't we just drive a wooden stake into the heart of this lie once and for all?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, of course. The problem is EXACTLY which ones, and when. This is like the comment from a famous doctor/lecturer who tells future doctors "In 4 years, half of everything you learned here will have been falsified. We just don't know which half!"

    It doesn't mean you don't get an education. It means you adapt. You recognize you could be wrong (most doctors are... A lot more than they realize).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    SOME humans are the problem...

    0bama, clintons, bidens, pelosi, and those that continue to vote for these traitors

    add in lots of external to the US types, like those that run the World Economic Forum as part of the problem
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by rhfinle 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    When the CO2 level gets low enough, all the plants die. Think about that. It's already lower than it has been since the Carboniferous Period.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    The CO2 "holy grail" of climate change has always been the "holy bullSchiff" blather pompously mouthed by tree huggers, who should bless the carbon dioxide trees breathe to give off oxygen so that even idiots may breathe too.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    They don't want to kill all humans, just the productive, thoughtful ones that can compete with those who have power.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    BTW, I am SO Grateful for THIS community.
    I read so many well-thought comments. Converse with people who understand REALITY over propaganda. It is refreshing. Thank you to ALL OF YOU for making the Gulch one of my few places of Reprieve.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    But Humans ARE the problem! lol

    Which is my problem with ALL of these groups. They want to save the Earth by killing the most successful species that ever existed on it (well, maybe second to cockroaches...)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    Thank God!

    The simple proof that CO2 is NOT what they say it is... Coca-Cola... If CO2 was that bad... Do you think you could BUY Carbonated Beverages. Huge Cannisters of CO2, Dry Ice for smoky effects (or any other usage). They would all be labelled as dangerous.

    Look what they did to Freon. (Which, as I understand it, was HEAVIER than air, and did not rise up to the OZONE layer... But never mind... Look the other way).

    This CO2 nonsense is tiresome. As the planet warms. The OCEANS RELEASE CO2 (for the same reasons that Coke goes flat when left out, and warm Coke even faster).

    But you cannot talk to people.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 month, 3 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    I'm an ME too Ab's, but nowadays do a lot of EE stuff due to professional Brownian Motion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 month, 3 weeks ago
    Biggest hoax in history with the clear objective to transfer power, nothing else.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 1 month, 4 weeks ago in reply to this comment.
    ... instead of going to Mars, the asteroid belt, and Jupiter for the resources needed to continue to advance humanity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 11
    Posted by $ Abaco 1 month, 4 weeks ago
    As a mechanical engineer I have a somewhat unique perspective. My line of work has been so impacted by this whole "carbon" story that I'm embarrassed, angry really, at how much my colleagues have bent over backward over this premise that carbon must be eliminated. Add to this the recent refrigerant revisions and you have a massive mess created by a select few who...big surprise here...aren't using basic science to generate their global mandates. These are mandates that have a massive impact on the design of buildings and the manufacture of air conditioning equipment. We here in the west are wringing our hands, cutting our own economic throats over this deal while China is, in terms of the global climate impact, a massive mess. The amount of engineering hours spent each year in America on this carbon/climate is astronomical. I'd bet it's 40% of engineering hours.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 1 month, 4 weeks ago
    Uh oh, does that mean the governor of NY will have to give up on the 75 billion dollar climate change super fund? How will the Marxist Democrats function without such a slush fund?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 1 month, 4 weeks ago
    If they had come to the Patrick Henry University (er, Florida Tech) and learned from me, I would have prepared them for all possible energy conversion alternatives. No re-education would have been necessary.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo