Marx and Obama

Posted by j_IR1776wg 10 years, 5 months ago to Government
66 comments | Share | Flag

Karl thought three phases would be needed to achieve Utopia. "...Marx described three necessary phases toward achieving his idea of utopia.
•Phase 1: A revolution must take place in order to overthrow the existing government. Marx emphasized the nee­d for total destruction of the existing system in order to move on to Phase 2.
•Phase 2: A dictator or elite leader (or leaders) must gain absolute control over the proletariat. During this phase, the new government exerts absolute control over the common citizen's personal choices -- including his or her education, religion, employment and even marriage. Collectivization of property and wealth must also take place.
•Phase 3: Achievement of utopia. This phase has never been attained because it requires that all non-communists be destroyed in order for the Communist Party to achieve supreme equality. In a Marxist utopia, everyone would happily share property and wealth, free from the restrictions that class-based systems require. The government would control all means of production so that the one-class system would remain constant, with no possibility of any middle class citizens rising back to the top. (You can see the full text of the manifesto at this Web site.)..."

Which of the three phases do you think Obama would say we're in?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Don't call me Comrade allosaur.
    "Comrade citizen" is reserved for my evil twin.
    That's All-American Allosaurus----to you!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 5 months ago
    communism simply put does not work. it never has and it never will.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And because Hilary doesn't believe in the violent overthrow of the existing order, she will be denied entry into the Oval Office by those Marxists who do.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes they are the offense and defense of the American Socialist football team in the global Karl Marx league.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by m1tmc 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately, the Republicans have been political cowards on several issues and since our media is in collusion with the 'useful idiots', its' influence contributes to their political expediency. o is working on phase 1, but I'm more concerned with where he will land when he leaves office. UN?, ?....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -7
    Posted by dartagnaneb 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-cruz-...
    You mean this (^) guy? You think he's possibly part of the solution?
    What is the issue with Obama anyway? Sure he may have overstepped constitutional bound because the House of Representatives has decided to remain politically stagnant, but under the Obama administration, America is doing better in a lot of ways than it ever has been(http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/readers/2014/11/07/obama-election-republicans-gop-democrats-senate/18606217/), no thanks to any legislation passed by the republicans you think are doing anything to help advance this country. I don't know how many people here are libertarians, but as one, I find that I have the perspective to take an unbiased look at the two parties- and all of you idiots who think that because you read Ayn Rand you're now an expert on objectivism and conservative philosophy- you're wrong. When you can begin to move on from the propaganda spewed by Fox news, and quit associating Obama with any form of Marxism, you will finally be able to reach a state that others might call "reasonable."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Most assume that Republicans have a different agenda than Democrats. It isn't compromise when both parties to an agreement have the same goal.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 5 months ago
    Unfortunately we are more in Phase 1 than Phase 2. Hillary Clinton disagreed with the Marx/Obama/Alinsky path on Phase 1. Hillary Clinton thought that by the slow takeover of the educational and governmental institutions that the revolution would be unnecessary. On this point, I think she was right for the same reason that you should try to boil the frog by slowly increasing the temperature rather than all at once.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes since there is only token opposition from the Republican party and too few Ted Cruzes, Obama has no need to compromise.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mdk2608 10 years, 5 months ago
    Good post. To understand Obama is to understand Marx. For this reason I do not believe he will move to the middle or compromise. It is against his philosphy
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Right Obama is just the latest to follow Teddy Roosevelt's lead in implementing Marx. I cant think of a President who could have read Galt's speech and meant it, not even Reagan.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 10 years, 5 months ago
    Good article. I noticed the article didn't mention that the League of Just Men were the group that approached KM with high-level material that was the basis for the stupid manifesto and that they wanted KM to be the spokesperson for it. And in doing so, kept the attention off of them and put any focus of anger/disgust/disagreement on KM. It's all about the deception. The devil is always in the details.

    Obama is just following what has already been planned, but it won't end with him, IMO.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo