Black legislator accuses white colleague’s toddler of racism

Posted by NealS 10 years, 1 month ago to Politics
36 comments | Share | Flag

A few things she said made me cringe:

“…I love his son, but he’s scared of me because of my color and that’s horrible.” Then she said, “It’s true.”

And, “The color of my skin, I get discriminated against. The color of your skin, you don’t.” This statement made me realize just how racism has turned around especially since this most recent administration. Can blacks be racist? Can a black be racist against another black? How about white racists against other whites? Or is only one definition allowed anymore?

Am I a racist because I’d be scared to death to walk down any street at night in a predominately black neighborhood, Ferguson as a perfect example? Or might anyone think that my fear might be because of reverse discrimination on someone else’s part?

Do blacks have a fear of walking in a predominately white neighborhood alone at night? Perhaps, but not in my neighborhood. In my neighborhood we’re asking anyone coming to our door for identification because many recently have proven to be casing the neighborhood looking for easy targets of break-ins. I ask everyone that comes to my door for identification, black or white, the bible people, magazine sales, everyone, and get license numbers, etc., just in case.

Too many subjects here, I was even confused as to where to put it, Politics, Culture, Education, History, Legislation, News, or Philosophy? Life just isn’t as simple as is used to be.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 10 years, 1 month ago
    Kinda makes me want to apologize, since I live in Indianapolis.

    People like her see the world through a completely racist prism, so they assume everyone else does. In all honesty, if you take away these people's racism, what would they have left?

    Only their own failure, and that's a reality that they just cannot face.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    As little as ten years ago, I'd have called you a nut. Now, almost daily we see stories of thought reading and artificial intelligence that will come to fruition within the next few years.

    God help us.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago
    I just thought of this while reviewing everyone's comments. This woman is expressing the same kind of viewpoint as a group again is expressing in Ferguson. The latest is they are harassing a black cop for being a racist? Are they against racism, or just against cops now? Are these people capable of understanding the truth or just so blind sighted as taught by the Al Sharpton's (Obama's and Holder's included) in this world?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    And someone elected her, in fact a lot of people elected her. I wonder what might happen if he handed his 18 month old to a Jew, or even a Christian, or how about a Gay person, or a Transvestite?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    As soon as the technology is invented... actually there are probably DARPA programs doing the research as we write. And it won't be enough to police our thoughts, the research is on implanting and creating our thoughts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    No, FFA, you're speaking of an act based upon a person's race, creed, color, age, etc. I'm speaking of the attitude itself...in other words, is it now a crime to not to want to associate with persons because of race, creed, color, faith, etc.?

    Enter the thought cops.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Ever heard of laws against "hate crimes"?
    "Although state laws vary, current statutes permit federal prosecution of hate crimes committed on the basis of a person's protected characteristics of race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)/FBI, as well as campus security authorities, are required to collect and publish hate crime statistics."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_...
    Note that this points out this comes from a FEDERAL law. States and local governments might show some common sense, but it takes a central government to really meddle enough to wreck a society.
    I agree with you. America is half way down the slippery slope and gaining speed toward the cliff.
    Watch out, sheep! There's no cliff hanger or a happy ending in this reality show!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 10 years, 1 month ago
    I think that there's an even more fundamental problem in play here. Now I might have missed the news that day, but when did racism become illegal? In bad taste, sure. But since when are there laws regarding people's attitudes? THAT my friends and correspondents, is a VERY slippery slope. The opposition has introduced this concept and controlled the narrative, so it's a good deal more insidious than simply being illegal. Similarly, before the Clinton administration there was no such thing as an "assault rifle" available to the general populace. Now anything that's not a blunderbuss is an assault rifle, with all of the negative connotations that go along with it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by nsnelson 10 years, 1 month ago
    Things like this just add to the caricature of liberals classifying everyone who disagrees with them as racists. Caricatures are usual sweeping generalizations (a fallacy), but they are caricatures for a reason (there is some degree of truth to them).

    The sad thing is, people who think everyone else does everything bad because they are racist, do not realize that that irrational belief reveals their own racism. Of course they deny reverse-racism is possible....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Clairity 10 years, 1 month ago
    I can only imagine what she calls the poor children in her neighborhood. she is Totally classless
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo