If it can produce thrust, it ought to be able to produce electricity?!

What do you make of this?
http://www.elforsk.se/Global/Omv%C3%A...

I have a degree in Biology, I ran a quality control lab doing mainly coal chemistry before I got into process and project management. Then I worked selling raw materials to the silicon metals and alloys industry. After that traveling life I took the series 7 and moved back to my little east Tennessee home town to open a small office referral only financial services practice. I tell you this to explain that much of this is over my head but a long time ago when I was getting into the management side of things a guy told me I don't need you to be an engineer but I need you to know enough so and engineer can't bs you. So assuming that this is not a total fabrication what I find compelling is the positive power output and isotopic shifts in the fuel. Do you see and big holes in this report?

I use "Pons and Fleischmann" as a term for making an ass of yourself with premature claims. Maybe they will be vindicated. I would love to see that.

isotopic shift

The latest reports do not claim to transmute Ni to Cu, Ash analysis is showing an isotopic from Ni-58, Ni-60 and Li -7 to Ni-62 and Li-6.

Apparently Sawyer has some fundamental misconceptions about physics. See this description:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/EmDrive

Here is Jerry Pournelle on the (reactionless) Dean Drive:
http://www.jerrypournelle.com/science...

For LENR (cold fusion) see this:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/LENR

I think Galt's engine is the work they are doing with LENR. We may end up with a source of electricity at a cost so low its not worth metering. If successful the question will be can they develop home units to get you off the grid or larger units that will use current power infrastructure. I guess they'll charge a subscription fee to cover maintenance. I'm afraid that would bloat the bureaucratic overhead and eat up all of the savings. The best scenario is the home units.

Galt's engine?