

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Isn't A==A?
:)
That's exactly what's been going on for several decades!
And it's the Electorate's Fault for buying into and supporting that Process!
[hugs, though...]
We don't know what it is...but us and everything we see didn't start itself...it's waaay too specific.
It's simply "the creator or creation...simple stupid.
Myself, in a rational scientific investigation see the consequences of creation more of a proxy of a direct connection than a direct one like the bicameral speak thinks...either way, it's obvious that life is favored and conscious life might very well be chosen...so to speak.
Just look up a quantum event...it's been observed and measured.
It's not mystical, it's quantum physical.
Rubio C did the same thing but escaped the bite on the ass.
If you want dirty tricks and lies look to trump...he's an ignorant loose cannon
But the concept, proven by quantum science that something created the cosmos and everything in it- directly or by consequence is not barbaric.
Your beef is not with the concept but with brain only humanoid's.
COMPLETELY AGREE. But in order to allow the economy to work, government has to actively remove the chains already in place. Ignoring the chains, restrictions, and bureaucracy isn't going to do anything.
"All Trump would have to do is reduce enforcement of the current laws actually."
I'm actually shocked that you would advocate for an Executive that doesn't enforce the laws. That's what we've had with Obama: selective enforcement. It's gotten us nowhere good. We need an Executive that will work with Congress and advocate to the People the necessity of repealing many of the existing laws currently hampering business. We need an Executive who will rescind the Executive Orders which just keep adding to that $2 TRILLION of annual regulatory burden. I'd really like to hear Trump come out and say that these are the actions he would take. It would do a lot for my confidence in him. Instead, he comes out saying that he'd rather increase taxes, or that he just likes a different version of government-run healthcare.
But, since none of those running are "good" from an Objectivist prspective, at least Trump is shaking up the establishment and he likes to make a deal. The others only want naked power. The Libertarian Convention has not yet been held, and perhaps many of those who are Cruzistas will see the value in the LP as the alternative.
Buying from china and sending them paper dollars has helped our economy by avoiding a lot of government red tape. I know how to make most of the items my small company buys from china, but dealing with US employees and laws is such an expensive proposition we just couldnt stay alive that way.
When asked, Trump said he liked the idea of using Executive Actions like Obama has. I would prefer someone who wasn't quite so willing to go it alone when he didn't get his way.
"Hildebeast and Sanders really want to increase taxes and take away freedoms though."
Yes, they do - especially Hillary. She'd like nothing more than to become Queen.
"I dont think he would do things tht hurt our economy like the others."
I'd sure love to see more specific policy statements from him on those matters. So far, there's not much to go on and that's scary. And he will have to do more than just "not hurt" the economy, he's actually got to encourage positive change. We're on a collision course with bankruptcy and collapse that is going to take a real leader and serious change to avoid. I don't see him advocating for a change in course on economic policy, and no specifics about how he's going to "make American great again." I want those specifics.
I'm not the common, uninformed voter who relies on endorsements and heady platitudes. I want substance. I look at history. I look at the current field and see a doddering, delusional old man, the devil incarnate in a pantsuit, an outsider, a bloviating narcissist, and an establishment shill, aside from a well-meaning but out-of-his-league passivist and an unknown aspirant.
Hildebeast and Sanders really want to increase taxes and take away freedoms though. They are specifically evil. Of the group, Trump is our best shot in my opinion. I dont think he would do things tht hurt our economy like the others. And I doubt he is into religious zealotry.
It is a war, and we do need to take sides. Socialism is really bad. At least Sanders tells us straight up where he is at. Hillary is the same, but hides it
Load more comments...