Hildebeast has many powerful friends that protect her, feed her contributions, and expect favors if she is president.

The hiding of emails so she can erase them in case they are discovered and would make her "look bad" is despicable. Its a reincarnation of the Nixon self serving philosophy. People should realize that a Hillary presidency would be one of secret deals, ulterior motives, and hiding of anything that might damage her. Helping us citizens just isnt on her plate, no matter what she says.

Waaaaay past time....................

What do WSJ and IBD stand for?

I think it may have been P.T. Barnum who phrased
it, "No one ever went broke underestimating the
intelligence of the American public."

So, do you want us to get stuck with Sanders?
This editorial says Hillary Clinton should "do
the right thing". What a laugh! When has she
ever done the right thing?!

Yeh...good luck with that....the inner circle operates on a different set of rules than the rest of us.

Mencken?

If there is any justice left in the justice system, they will convict her and put her away for life. Treason isn't the least of the offenses she has committed.

Clinton relies on the stupidity of the masses. Her line about not sending or receiving anything marked classified plays to the idea that information isn't classified unless it's marked so. The reality is that information is marked BECAUSE IT'S CLASSIFIED. I spent my entire professional life in classified environments, and saw people severely punished for far less mishandling of classified information than has been exhibited by Hillary Clinton.

Even if the candidate slides by without punishment, at the very least she's exhibited incompetence and carelessness with regard to handling of sensitive government information. For someone presenting herself as the model of a powerful female leader, she hasn't hesitated to play the "helpless" card when it suits her. She's played witless "grandma", and even "dumb blonde" (Wipe the server? You mean, like with a cloth?). She's a dangerous, conniving, unscrupulous, merciless political figure who shouldn't ever be allowed the reins of power.

And why shouldn't she? She always has in the past.

She thinks that she'll get a pass. That may well be the case. If so, frankly, I will no longer care who gets elected because the country is shot through with so much corruption that it's not worth saving.

It's a nice fantasy. All the basic info is out there. If there were to be a Democrat revolt, it would have happened already. The hildabeast continues to gain in the delegate count. The FBI may well push for an indictment, but probably the most Lynch will do is say, "Maybe some technical points of law were bent, but no harm, no foul. Since nobody was hurt the interests of justice would not be served by a prosecution." And that will be the end of it.

Suspend her campaign are you crazy. she doesn't recognize that thought. she is a politician and that is all you have to know.

Well, I was leaning to the middle, but I only look at particular stock articles and only recently has their politics ramped up. I still think a publication like this calling her what she is, is some hopeful sign. Although it is not to the audience that needs to wake up to the fact, so on that end, it is not that impactive.

"IBD is usually middle of the road and doesn't"
To me a moderate right-wing publication would be the WSJ. IBD, at least when I last picked it up, is a far right publication. I read about half of the article. The fact that her critics are still on about this shows me they have absolutely nothing to criticize about her. It way too early to say this, but I don't see how Clinton can lose.