Princeton Will Still Use Woodrow Wilson's Name, But Will Emphasize His Racism

Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years ago to History
44 comments | Share | Flag

Assures it is "no endorsement" of Wilson's segregationist views.

Finally a ray of truth about our 2nd progressive president


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    It's our duty to point these things out in spite of the back lash...if they say your a racist then just repeat the "strangest secret" by Nightingale..."You become what you think about most of the time".

    It's also important to point out that It's not ok to accept pagan bicameral barbaric practices that disempowers or physically harms another in this day and age.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    No, that attitude was perpetuated by the Black African tribal chief's and everyone else picked up on it. Remember...there were many Black American slave owners as well.
    Next to Africans themselves the next biggest slave owners were the muslims...not to mention, that was the meme of the times, England and America were the first to rethink that concept.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years ago
    Obama has created an entitled and arrogant black culture by pandering to blacks and giving them freebies. It's politically incorrect to say of course, but I am DONE with the entitled black culture. I could care less about race, am not a racist, but I am a culturist and definitely like or dislike certain cultures. I don't like entitled cultures like the current black culture, and I don't like Islam for the "kill the non believers" attitudes. I want little or nothing to do with the socialist cultures. And I don't see anything wrong with these views
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Stormi 9 years ago
    I doubt they will bring up the communists in Wilson's cabinet, as that would be contrary to what they want students to think. That is something they would admire. I am really sick of this lets blame dead white guys, be they writers or politicians, for wrongs done in another era, one not so politically over-correct. Who has done more to cause racism in the current era, who has turned blacks and others into welfare slaves, who has no respect for blacks - in my view, Obama, second only to Hillary Clinton. Why are these same students not concerned about oppressed and abused women in Muslin countries,whose men send millions to the Clinton Foundation? There is a stupid double standard in these colleges and it needs to be exposed.,Does former First Lady, Sec. of State Hillary care that these women are not allowed to attend class with these men? I was the sole female in a class that was 98% Muslin males college class, and the guys could do nothing about it, but tell me it would not happen in their country. Where is the outrage for current politician two-faced players?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Wasn't the whole idea of slavery to get cheap and obedient labor? All that stuff about blacks being inferior animals was just bullshit propaganda the whites came up with to keep the blacks from getting out of bondage
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years ago
    There is a street in Detroit called Woodrow Wilson Blvd. I recommended that it be changed to Ronald Reagan Blvd. Fat chance.
    Wilson was not only a Progressive and a racist, but also a phony. Unable to perform as president due to illness, it was kept a secret as his wife took over his duties and some say she was worse than him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years ago
    Yes, Princeton, let's help the once racist Democrat party keep the Obamanable divisive propaganda of unfair racism foremost in the enslaved minds still stuck on its plantation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Who wisely figured out to have a union they had to keep every one happy and installed mechanisms to make that happen., The south for example banned importation of slaves while the north continued to import them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    The south did not free all it's slaves for six to twelve months after Appamattox. Once Lincoln was gone his successor heavily supported a pro racist attitude and the last state to repeal those laws was Mississippi in 2003.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    of course they were Democrats and that discriminatory racist attitude continues to this day but now it's destroying civil rights.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    No...the south continued to discriminate as if Black Americans were still slaves and did everything they could to keep them from enjoying their freedom or becoming value creators.
    Had we all learned in school of the many amazing Black Americans prior and during our founding there would of never been any doubt that they in fact were no different than the rest of us...progressive liberal thinking would have never taken hold.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by FelixORiley 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Are you saying that the South retained slaves?
    Are you saying that a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still? So why would you expect "Southerners" to alter their perception? Or are you saying that the Northern Industrialists were too lazy to create machinery that would have made human labor obsolete thus eliminating the perceived need for such labor? Better to kill by force than establish freedom by creation.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Good point, but, be thankful they are admitting that much though. During the generation in which Black Americans would have been fully assimilated into the American culture...he re-started segregation all over again...also understand that the democrapic south still carried on as if we never had a civil war that freed our fellow Americans.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    It doesn't matter whether the founders engaged in freeing slaves or necessarily matter what their attitudes were; what matters is this movement can be a backdoor for those who actively seek a way to make our country more receptive to communism.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Good point. The way I put it is I refuse to accept responsibility for anything that occurred prior to my birth and prior to my gaining the ability to so something about it. But I fully accept responsibility for doing nothing when I gained that ability.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years ago
    If that is true and iit is then why not emphasize his Marxist Leninist leanings?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Many of which couldn't let them free because of the law...such was the case with Jefferson as he inherited his fathers slaves. But make no mistake, there were plenty that were free and engaged in our independence. Check it out sometime at wallbuilders.com
    Yes, it's the past, but I do celebrate This One because it acknowledges the blame squarely where it belonged.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 9 years ago
    Somebody with a bully pulpit better start speaking out against this current trend to hold the dead accountable for their sins as if they are an affront to us today. The past is the past; logically we should be able to be objective it about it, not reactive. This isn't helping minorities in any real sense to 'erase history', but it is a very deliberate and calculating step to progressively undermine liberty and our future. We have to draw a line soon.

    Both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written by slave owners.
    Think about it.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo