16

NYC Libtard Councilpeople To Walmart : Stop Giving Money To Charities!

Posted by khalling 10 years, 10 months ago to Politics
88 comments | Share | Flag

What is the liberal obsession with Walmart?! Poor people don ' t shop at Whole Foods or buy their clothing at Macy's you stupid idiots! Your war against Walmart is a war against them! But who cares as long as they can hinder a successful capitalistic model that benefits the lower socio economic sector of the US-who the libtards swear they're championing!


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There is actually a nationwide union backed group that educates people on how to fight Wal Mart when they try to open in your community. When they tried to build up the street from us a group called Communities First sprang up to fight them. They seemed surprised that I would not openly support them. It was just a bunch of green weenies. Wal Mart needed a number of variances to build and I was told that at the hearing no objections were heard and the paperwork granting the variances was filled out ahead of time. I spoke out against that. The property had an old State mental hospital on it (Dixmont). Previous developers avoided the site because the State had left behind Medical Waste that was costly to remove. Late one night the State legislators changed the laws concerning the removal of these items. That change cut many thousands of dollars off the development cost. I spoke out against that. In the end it was not built. We made national news when the site slid and blocked a 4 lane highway and railroad tracks. The variances that were given should never have been allowed. The site was known to be unstable but big money talks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They use their power as a large customer to get the best deals, which they then provide to their own customers.

    I've been working with a significant WalMart supplier for the past 5 years or so, on and off. WM is relentless in pursuing lower costs. And have been quite innovative in achieving those savings, including pushing their suppliers to improve.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    lol I'm not a small business owner (yet). As you know, I work for Wal-Mart. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I remember all the hoops my town jumped through to bring in a Cosco. They (we) paid for a turn -in off a frontage road. Of course discounting the crony arrangement of the highway company hired to put it in, there were additional huge tax incentives given that last for years and the positioning of the access penned in some small businesses next to the Cosco basically diverting the driveby and the little businesses either dried up or were forced to relocate. In capitalism, someone new to the community is sensitive to their neighbors because they need to portray good will to all of their customers. But if city governments give them preferential treatment they begin to expect it and even act as a bully. The one thing I 'll say about Walnart, they usually work against a huge negative resistence in most of the communities they go in, As this article indicates. I used to avoid Walmart. I prefer to pay more for quality and service. But I have also purchased some quality items there and gotten a higher level of service at times (in one case that comes to mind it was sporting goods) so ....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A few years back a Super Wal Mart opened near where my brother lives. In PA if you pay to have a highway study done you can pay the Department of Transportation to put a traffic light and turn lane into your lot. Wal Mart paid all those fees and then got an equal reduction in property taxes to offset the cost. That means all the businesses around them paid for a turn lane going into Wal Mart. I have sold products over the years that manufactures change in some way so they can sell it cheaper to Wal Mart. I don't mind that but the manufactures put the cheaper item in the same bag, bottle or package. The consumer thinks they are getting the same product. I find that deceitful. Even an educated consumer has trouble knowing the difference.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    They also use the Japanese tactic of taking a loss at one location to drive competition away, which they can survive because of the income from their thousands of other locations.

    "I assumed you would have issues with Walmart."

    I certainly do... ahem. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My father used to tell me about something his grade school teacher said in the 30s. This is from ancient memory, so bear with me...

    He said his teacher got up in front of the class to address the issue of standard-of-living differences between whites and blacks. Why, I have no idea.

    The movie "Knight and Day" reminded me of what she did next. In that movie, Tom Cruise holds his hand at head level to Cameron Diaz and says, "your odds of survival with me", then lowers it to knee level and says, "without me".

    The teacher held her hand up high and said, "we're up here". Then she held her other hand down low and said, "And they're down here". Then she said, "you can't (or "you can't easily") bring them up to here (she raised the lower hand level with the upper hand), but you can lower us down to there (she then dropped both hands).

    It's always been easier to destroy a high level of prosperity among a subset of people, than to "redistribute" prosperity to the whole set.

    The high level of prosperity among the subset acts as incentive for free people to join that subset; government can only create artificial barriers that affect some and not others. If, on the other hand, you let the free market decide, the level of prosperity of most will increase, more will join the higher and higher subsets, and justice will prevail (in that you can earn your way to the maximum level of prosperity your physical, mental, and emotional makeup allow). Think of it as evolution in action.

    "
    "Now," he went on. drawing on his cigar, "out here,
    you've got problems from the bottom up, instead. Y'all
    understand, you've got an unusual rulin' class here. A
    full third of the population, and visible. Then the CD
    sends you Earth's barbarians. And what do you do? You
    give them a chance. You give them no excuses. None.
    You make it plain, their failures are their own fault, and
    you rub it in by making the rewards of success visible
    and believable.

    "That worked fine so long as you didn't get over-
    whelmed. Lots of them made good, you've achieved a
    remarkable and admirable social mobility. But a lot
    just don't make good. Too many generations of failure,
    too long away from even suspecting what citizenship
    is. They see you as rich slavemasters, and they get told
    all they got to do is take what's coming to them. Okay,
    you can handle that if you don't lose your nerve, but
    nobody ever said it was going to be easy."
    "
    - Pournelle, Stirling, "Prince of Sparta"

    I have never understood the victim mentality. I may be a failure, but at least I admit my failure; I don't pretend I'm a victim of some innocent bystanders' nonexistent malice, thus inflating my importance and denigrating their characters.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I assumed you would have issues with Walmart. Can you point out crony deals? I am not aware of specific issues. I realize they can come into a community and leverage tax credits etc-which I am firmly against. Morality aside, companies taking advantage of those deals are the first companies to pull up stakes and leave the town, whereas local businesses are in it for the long haul high and dry
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 10 years, 10 months ago
    The liberal obsession is strange. I have some issues with Wal-Mart. They do use their size and influence to get some James Taggert type deals. It would seem to fit well with the Liberal agenda. I think the union thing is just pandering. I believe Wal-Mart gives more money to Republicans.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 10 months ago
    The destruction of capitalism is more important than the lower socioeconomic sector to them. Besides, their votes are already bought and paid for. It is time to repay their union buddies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LetsShrug 10 years, 10 months ago
    Yes, jbrenner...I think it is all about unions. Mafia tactics.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lrbeggs 10 years, 10 months ago
    Success and achievement are anathema. All affluence must be destroyed. THE GOVERNMENT must care for us all and be the ultimate power. No one is better than anyone else. Producers are evil...Anyone making money is evil.
    EQUALITY FOR ALL in the gutter.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo