15

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Posted by $ nickursis 8 years, 8 months ago to Government
82 comments | Share | Flag

Poster boy for the Beast. And one of her money boys. And a sign of the future. We are in deep doo...

All Comments

Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ splumb 8 years, 8 months ago
    The sooner that evil bastard is in the ground, the better.
    I have a bottle of champagne waiting patiently in the fridge, ready for that glorious day.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Its just campaign season brings out very different conclusions using what appears to be the same input. Please accept my apologies for ranting, Rolf. If you must leave to preserve your mental health, please come back after the election when the discussions will likely be more productive, less stressful, more mentally stimulating, and entertaining.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My objective is more liberty, freer markets, much smaller government. Neither Trump nor Hillary achieve my goals. Defeating Hillary is just another lesser-evil rubbish goal. The details of Trump's actions have been posted here in the Gulch repeatedly and those articles (regardless of their source) have not been refuted publicly by Trump, his campaign, or the GOP. Trump has danced around the topics while never refuting them and not promising anything to the contrary. Just another double-talking politician with a history of complicity with leftists.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We disagree on Trump. Read through past postings here on trump which provide references to his support for gun control, his actions using eminent domain to take property for his own advantage from an unwilling owner, and his contributions to leftist candidates. They have been posted several times and are not leftist propaganda, but truth.
    Your goal appears to be "Defeat Hillary." I have heard that fear rubbish from the GOP for decades and using it as a goal does not achieve anything but a bigger state, less liberty and market manipulation.
    That solution does not fly and it never did. (I do not mean to imply that your intentions are the same as the GOP.)
    No more lesser evil rubbish.
    Finally, I avoid using the phrase "I know" unless I originated the data. "I think" is more accurate when I am making a judgement based on data I did not observe myself.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He's well known for using insider information and has been taken to task on more than one occasion. but somehow always slips through the net. Funny thing is how come his taxes are being scrutinized considering the amounts involved and their locations.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Until then you can use objectivism to validate or not validate any belief system especially those political but the final choice is not one any of us propose or support but the choice you yourself make after testing it and applying your own set of moral values. Until then.... even after then your observations, your testing and your conclusions coupled with your ethics are all that matters. Your decision. From your comments (and I shoud interject born in UK as a result of those times but of one US parent) I would think this is the kind of place you shoud be. A lot of our members are not like some of and there are long and serious philosophical discussions without the fireworks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rolf 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Until then I will believe that most people are ah*s, the society we now have sux, that I wasted 23 years of my life in service to my adopted country (but am still proud of the time I gave), that we, even on this site, will never be able to agree on anything and I'm gonna crawl back into my prepper hole and wait for the first person to tell me to my face that I can't live and vote the way the Constitution tells me I can. And that time is near (within the next 10 to 15). Been here for over 2 years and now, adios. I just can't take all the negativity anymore.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I looked again and found my copy of the platform was something put out at the time of the convention and NOT the current copy although it did come from the Libetarian Partys website.

    So please take this as an apology as the current version has much in the way of corrections and only a couple of minor non-sacred ground issues both of which I consider unimportant to the task at hand.

    Having said that publicly and it's not the first time I've been in that position....

    Part of the problem as I see it is the candidates themselves both political insiders and acting accordingly. Weld is a deal killer as i consider the choice of the potential President especially when selected by a vote of one the actual Presidential Candidate to be of primie importance.

    But the comments of the two of them in various venues first rushing to support Hillary and hen the Second Amendment issue and similar instances of catrering to the left are very disappointing to say the least. I can't see them as Consitutional Centrists and Weld is a disaster in that respect.

    What they say as opposed to the platform is unacceptable and in my mind makes them non viable. The opportunities they have passed up to broaden their voter base are a mystery.

    So I'm going back to my own stance which is Defeat Hillary AND the Republican party as the two major objectives using any tool i can morally countenance to complete that mssion statement.

    But iit is a good platform. Damn shame it deserves better than iit got in the way of candidates.

    Any chance of 15% or being included in the debates anyway? .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 8 years, 8 months ago
    Not bizarre, he owns the outlets or, at very least, exerts enough financial influence to hinder and/or prevent exposure.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 8 years, 8 months ago
    George Soros, if Rand had thought about him, would have been the perfect Ellsworth Monckton Toohey analogue in Atlas Shrugged. Rand created some of the weakest villains in all of literature. She would have done better to create a George Soros.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have seen the platform and some of the speeches.
    Have you observed the results of the past 30 years of lesser evil support? Do you make decisions based on promises or actions?
    You ask questions assuming certain results from a Trump victory that have no support in Trump's past actions.
    I think Trump will do none of the positive things that Trump wants you to believe. His actions in the past are evidence against him.
    You have decided to support the person you believe is a lesser evil based on his speeches, but with no basis in his actions.
    That is the same error that GOP voters have made for 30 years. Ignoring reality will not improve reality.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I wasn't taking to you MA, so I answered using terms that the poster will understand. You want to change his language, go ahead. But don't expect others to do the same.
    Again you repeat the same mistakes of the past 30 years, MA. Trump buys us nothing as he has consistently acted as a looter and statist.
    Objectivism is the basis of my conclusions. Ignoring reality is not what objectivists do. The reality is that Trump is a statist. I do not support Trump. Hillary is a statist. I do not support Hillary.
    Your argument is solely to choose a lesser evil. The past 30 years have proven that is a wrong choice. Trump is not better than the past poor GOP candidates.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rolf 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No, I really didn't misunderstand. It's just this attitude that I supposedly have in that, because of fear, I will vote for the lesser of two evils, is part of what's driving me away from this site. Unless and until the desired candidate (for any office) conforms to the ideals of the Rand idealology they should receive my vote. In principal absolutely true; in today's reality, not a chance in Hell will there ever be someone with these principles AND the money required to run for office. Raised in Hannover Germany in the late '30's and naturalized here in the mid 60's, I have seen enough to be discouraged to the point of "Just give me some change (not chains, like Obama promised and delivered)." Should that candidate ever appear, I will absolutely vote for him. Until then.......
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't have to address your conclusions that are unsupportable in reality or have no validity to my comments. You have chosen to support evil of Trump in fear of Hillary. Instead of rebutting the facts of Trump's past actions you sling insults that accuse me of the opposite of my often stated and demonstrated principles. Your conclusions have no basis in fact and there is no evidence in my posts for them. The fact is that I simply disagree with your choice of Trump and you have no way to refute the logic of my decision. Must you justify your choice by pretending that every other candidate is a leftist? That is irrational and unsupportable in reality.
    I will decide who gets my vote sometime prior to going to the polls. Johnson has the lead by a large margin at present.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by Dobrien 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Soros and Black Wednesday 9/15/92. About 2 years previously the Brits entered into a agreement with Eu to maintain a range on the rate of exchange tied to the mark as British inflation was 3x Germany the pound was moving toward the low end of the range . For 2 months Soro was shorting the pound , as govt policy decisions added to the weakness. I suppose it was good luck and not knowledge of govt actions in advance that soros benefitted from.
    When the govt. was unable to keep the pound above the agreed rate. Britain was forced to with draw from the ERM (Euro Exchange Rate Mechanism).
    Soros on 9/15/92 began massive selling .
    Brits had emergency meetings and on the morning of the 16th they attempted to prop the pound by buying ,unfortunately Soros was selling so heavily and fast that the pound was overwhelmed. He made a billion and the British tax payers lost 3.3 billion pounds plus they got a recession.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by jabuttrick 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    MA: I'm curious. What is there in the Libertarian Platform which you consider "leftist"? Please be specific.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 8 years, 8 months ago
    I think that it is likely Soros has inside information or even cronies inside some of the central banks around the world and that was partly how he made so much money in currency speculation..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mia767ca 8 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    lay down with dogs...obama, clinton, soros...get up with fleas...and they cross pollinate...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo