That's wishful thinking.

They certainly would not last long on this forum. Not only is their grammar atrocious but the limited scope of their comments is grade school, at best. Excellent choices for Darwinian concept of non-reproductive extinction. They, most likely, won't live long enough to reproduce.

According to the comments the written story has been altered. If you read the story and don't watch the video you don't know the race of the victim or the attacker. The police are asking for help and give a description of the suspect but don't include his race. This is crazy.

I hadn't looked at them. wow

I agree. But he has stepped in now at least 4 or 5 times on crimes and decided who was the injured party based on race. He of course, refuses to acknowledge that a large percentage of young black males are violent criminals. Why is this? Thomas Sowell tackles that quetion in this article from last year:
http://nationalreview.com/articles/29991...

God that's disgusting. It's getting harder every day to have hope for the future. And hate crimes are a ridiculous concept and no the President shouldn't get involved. No one but local police should very involved.

Wow...the comments are.... something else.

The question should be, I think, should the POTUS get involved? Personally, my opinion is no. He is currently using the military as nothing more than a political tool to try and leverage public opinion against anyone who does not agree with him or does not like the ACA.