Exactly true, lucky for us, we read, then heed.That is why it is so painful to look at MSM, 98% of their material is misleading just that way.

And of course it would be Trump's fault!

I get that.

But posting a title which is what the opposition says/thinks make generate the false impression that the title is true.

Many people don't read the article only the title and they are left with the impression of what the title claims.

The WSJ does that all the time. Their titles are in clash with the contents and despite of getting drubbed every day for it by readers, they keep doing it.

That is a completely reasonable position, given the evidence so far this year. Even with a GSM, it will take time, and I have not seen anyone making a reasonable effort at what the overall global climate will look like, SC could still be hosed, if the overall winds shift to northeast or southeast instead of prevailing west. Need to see if anyone has something on that.

Exactly, look at Paris and Macron getting people so angry over fuel price increases to "pay for clean energy, whether you want it or not" all to do France's part in stopping the unstoppable. Bet 0 of that money goes into anything.

Ah, read the comment I made "classic deep state". That was exactly what they were trying to do, Yet go look at who made the report. More deep state. It is like the force, it surrounds and penetrates. Only this is the dark side....Don't ignore their propaganda because it is disturbing and you can see it is manipulative. Use it as a starting point and go back and then you see who also is playing in the game, and just how deep the rot is. Know thy enemy...

True, there is always a catastrophe waiting, as the deep state says "never let a good crisis go to waste" (Rahm Emmanual, mayor of the great gun restricting, murder ridden deep state of shi#cago). So one wonders, why no effort to get off this rock since the 70's?

There is a binary star system which has a chance of a super gamma ray burst about 8000 light years away which, if pointed toward the Earth, would strip the atmosphere of ozone. If that and a possible asteroid might hit in the not too far future, the sky is falling idiots have a lot to fall back on if the catastrophic climate change guess does not work out.

I wonder why Nickursis posted this article under its original (false) title?

It makes it look like the WH was to blame for some horrendous crime, as the left always implies.

These days there is no difference between the NYT or the WSJ. The latter has graduated to a new low level.

The problem is that people don't just try to persuade people regarding their ideas (or "discoveries") about nature; they try to enshrine their discoveries into law and force them onto people by government edict.--And if some "discovery" turns out to be a mistake, it is all the harder to correct it then, and free people from it.

Thanks FFA. I'd totally forgotten about the Imperial valley. They get the last sip of the Colorado before it passes into Mexico to the Sea of Cortez.

I also feel sorry for the long time residents and
I'm glad you aren't as dependent on the river as Imperial Valley- where a large portion of the US winter vegetable crop grows, preimert1.

Per these articles SC get 60-65% of its water from the Colorado,
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/101697_colora...
http://www.crwua.org/colorado-river/m...
I think CA cut some use from the Colorado in 2003 and will have to cut more if the system drops lower per this article:
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...
"Imperial Irrigation District and other farm districts in southeastern California control roughly 75% of California’s 4.4 million-acre-foot share."
I hope that global cooling starts to build up the snow and the Colorado system recovers and can continue to provide a supply for farmers.

Sorry about the bad link. The article is in the January 2003 issue at http://www.libertyunbound.com/archive...
Search for Fraud in the Forest
;^)

Thanks, FFA. (The link you cited failed BTW) Since I live close to a beach in SC we don't have many trees and less than a third of our water comes from the Colorado. Most of it comes by aquaduct from up north plus ground water. We also use a lot of recycled water for irrigation and salt water barrier wells. The recent Malibu fire consumed mostly chaparral and liberal sho biz
folks' beach houses. I really feel sorry for the folks in Paradise who have lived there since 1850 gold rush days.

Ooops, good catch, early 20th century. Sheep replaced cattle after cattle over grazed a huge part of the west and then the sheep were all that could survive, much as many parts of Austrailia do today.

And don't forget the Ozone Hole crisis. Man, they are creative!

Don't you mean "1930's"? Or "20th century"? (addressed to nickursis).

The ability to live in the forest is not rocket science. Metal roofs reduce the odds of your house burning by 50%, and you can install an external sprinkler that runs on batteries and have a in ground tank as a reserve for it, will preserve the house. Its not too hard. It just may violate their sensibilities, need to merge with the herd, and all the HOA agreements, so thats their problem.

It's not the forest fires that are the problem. It's the fact that people are building homes in the forest because the forest is an attractive place to live. (If the forest was not there it would be an ugy desert- like so much of southern CA would be without all the water coming from the Colorado river- the source of water outside of CA.) If there weren't any homes in the forest there would be no liberal outcry to "do something."
Typical liberals- they cause a problem themselves and then insist that government steal our money to protect the liberals property.
If you want to live in the forest, then accept the danger yourself (not you specifically, preimert1;^) and pay for it yourself when the forest burns down your house. Its like a hurricane hitting coastal homes, or floods on flood plains. When you choose to build your house in a dangerous area, then it's your problem. Don't insist that others pay for your bad decisions.
(Yes, I agree, government agencies are not managing the forests on federal property as well as private owners could. This issue has been exposed for many years by people like Randall O'Toole at Liberty magazine. See Fraud in the Forest - http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/f...

Thanks for the voice of reason, nick. +1

Right. The best way to reduce or eliminate forest fires is to get rid of all the trees. Its true that they produce some oxygen, but I read where most of it comes from comes from plankton in the oceans.

I agree with the Kalifornia position, but disagree with Rainforest. Basically, they have no idea what is in it, biologically, many discoveries made there. Also, just like the global warming loons, they do not understand the full impat of the rain-forest ecologically in the overall weather and climate system. It does act as a huge carbon sink, but also generates massive water vapor and oxygen. I hate to see them trash something no one fully understands, then go, "oops" afterwards...A lot of the "farming" is incredibly inefficient, and grazing can just create a desert, ask the Midwest, the dust-bowl was born from sheep grazing in the early part of the 30th century. Along came a warming trend and poof, you are screwed.

President Trump has an ally in Brazil's new president elect Jair Bolsonaro when it comes to the climate change hoax. (http://enews.earthlink.net/article/to...) Bolsonaro has the right idea in cutting back the Brazilian rain forest and allowing producers to graze cattle and grow more soy beans on the land. Dire warnings of statist- sponsored climate scientists to the contrary.

If president Trump would allow clear cutting of federal forest land here in California, it would greatly reduce incidence of these massive forest fires, produce more timber for home construction while making more land available for new homes. What's not to like. To hell with all those libtard tree hugging scientists.

I guess the WSJ is competing with the NYT for who can fail the most:

https://watchers.news/2018/10/04/major-early-season-snowstorm-shatters-calgary-s-snow-temperature-precipitation-and-humidity-records-canada/
(You will need to cut and paste above, it wont hyper link)

Even the deep state news media can't hide it:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weathe...

We should see if we can get that episode and YouTube it...