12

Regulation Against “Hate Speech” and “Fake News” Is a Leftist Ploy

Posted by Vinay 5 years, 8 months ago to Politics
45 comments | Share | Flag

Impeded by the redoubtable First Amendment in the U.S., the Left has found new devices to block well-reasoned and scientific opinions that oppose its orthodoxy. The devices have been deployed in legislation and regulation internationally, and across U.S. campuses.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 5 years, 8 months ago
    I don't agree with criminalizing emotions. Just actions.
    I also think we should get out of the U.N. It never should have been started in the first place.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 8 months ago
    I hate globalist satanic luciferian pee doh files and their enablers.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 5 years, 8 months ago
    The only regulation we need in this country about Hate Speech and "Fake News" is a leader that won't take it.

    Old news from April but very powerful, even though nothing has been done about much of it yet:
    https://youtu.be/5yzVAxIKKbI
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Storo 5 years, 8 months ago
    While we’re at it, consider the crime of “depriving an individual of his or her Civil Rights”. Before “hate crimes” this was the tool of the left to get someone they couldn’t convict of an actual crime. I can recall this pretext used many times to go after someone found not guilty of a charged crime or where there was not sufficient evidence to charge an individual. It was done mostly by the Feds, and often where they had no real jurisdiction.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Orwellian 5 years, 8 months ago
    We have now edged deeply into the "Anthem" concept, there is no I only we. WE must follow the rule and if I diverge I will be punished. One country one court at a time. One look at the UNESCO Constitution say enough.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by STEVEDUNN46 5 years, 8 months ago
    there should be no such thing as a hate crime. if it is illegal to beat the tar out of someone, then prosecute for beating the tar out of some one. not for the thoughts of the individual.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 5 years, 8 months ago
    It is abundantly clear that this is a totalitarian approach.

    Why wouldn't one want all the "inappropriate" thinkers to expose themselves so we know who they are?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BCRinFremont 5 years, 8 months ago
    Not agreeing with the many who call that tiger over there a cow is now a hate crime... Many will be eaten by cows in a not to distant future. Run Away, run away, run away!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    In reality, it shouldn't matter if a person hates another person or people. Until someone takes action that physically harms another, it should not be a crime. Soon we will become criminals for thinking bad thoughts.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 5 years, 8 months ago
    Unfortunately, this is no different from the 3 or 4 people that were supposedly going to kill a bunch of people this week. They were arrested for being accused of possibly going to kill people and they had guns and body armor. When did it become a crime, to not hurt anyone. We are on a very slippery slope.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed, but that fortunately is much harder these days; digital copies abound and are easily hidden from the authorities.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 5 years, 8 months ago
    Of course...

    Burn the books!- while we're at it...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, indeed, that IS the problem. Attacking belief systems, but only certain ones, is "hate speech."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you for the compliment. I agree that "hate crime" is also a floatong concepts, a crime is a crime.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Solver 5 years, 8 months ago
    So if you write or speak against a person for “who they are” that’s now hate speech. But if you write or speak against a person for what they believe in or what they do, that can also be considered hate speech because of “who they are.”
    That will teach us not to write or speak, or think.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by mshupe 5 years, 8 months ago
    Great piece. Even the terms "hate speech" and "hate crimes" are totally subjective. I think they can also be considered floating concepts, which is perfectly aligned with leftist ideology.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 5 years, 8 months ago
    👍 Thanks for exposing the irrationality of this attack on individual liberty by the state, Vinay.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo