LOL!

Don't know what it is, term2, but it's looking like "Fair And Balanced" has got somebody's thumb on the left scale.

Exactly

Maybe the FOX people are leaning on him to be more leftist. FOX has turned left in major ways as a newtowrk. Maybe they are just looking at the popularity of bashing trump, and dont want 4 more years of divided government.

Exactly !!! The issue is closed for me. I agree with him as to what he did.

I used to live in Calif. I dont get how expensive it is at all. Maybe the influx of illegals has jacked up housing demand, although a lot of people just camp on the streets. I dont even want to visit Calif anymore.

I have concluded that the Bidens are crooked, just like Hillary, but NOT as good at it as she was. The dummy actually gloated on TV about what he did. I think his presidential aspirations are done. He couldnt beat Trump anyway.

Hidden agendas just change with the wind I guess. He has been dead to me for awhile now, as is FOX. Jeanine should move to Youtube.

I stopped watching FOX some time ago. I noticed they were always trying to be "fair and balanced:..I dont get how one can argue giving air time to thugs and thieves who are against individual liberty is FAIR

I stopped watching or listening to Judge Nap some time ago, when he flipped. Now he just afrgues against Trump, which I dont need to waste time listening to.

They have hidden agendas which makes their actions understandable (if we knew their agendas), They are weather vanes that turn in the wind, depending on what they are after at the moment.

The leftists are indeed violent and entitled now. Scary actually.

Thanks for the link to the "rules". I've seen them before - a long time ago - but a refresher is always welcome. You can see these rules being applied every day in the Neo Communists (Democrats) and their media sycophants constant attacks on Trump and anyone associated with him or anyone who supports him.

I think we're in agreement here. I've lost my respect for Chris Wallace, even more since he tried that Mueller subpoena stunt with Putin in Helsinki and then all the follow up news was about Wallace and ignored Putin's response. No news cast ever mentioned those papers weren't worth the paper they were printed on outside the US and no news cast ever mentioned that Putin flat out told Wallace the Russian Federation signed a mutual treaty with the US in 1999 dealing with the issue and if Mueller wanted, he could file the proper requests through the treatry and Putin would make sure the interviews with Russian citizens were set up for Mueller in Moscow. Mueller never took up the offer. Wallace was being a jerk. Period.

I haven't watched Smith in a long, long time. In fact if I'm watching news when he comes on, I turn the TV off. Then there's Chris Wallace who has been coming out stronger as an anti-Trumper. My wife has her news and commentary shows that she still watches but even she has been turning off the TV at certain times. Not because we don't want to be informed, we do. However, I want news by someone who will give me the news without making faces or rolling their eyes and let me make up my mind. As a result, I've been watching One America News more often. The rest of the time, I just turn off the TV. In fact, I keep up with current events better by reading this blog than by watching the news. We you guys post something it's usually current and prompts me to do more research.

You seem to have a point regarding FOX News, wmiranda. I don't normally catch the news during the weekdays and almost never see Shepard Smith, but Trump gave a live appearance the other day I happened to catch and Shepard Smith was the news guy at the time and the quips and remarks he made sounded like CNN rather than FOX. He was down right lefty snarky in his commentary. I shut it off.

From the Dodd interview: “At that time, their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914, when World War I broke out. At that point, they come to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, we must control education in the United States. And they realize that is a pretty big task. To them it is too big for them alone.

So they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with a suggestion: that portion of education which could be considered domestic should be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation, and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment.

They then decide that the key to the success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American History. So, they approach four of the then most prominent teachers of American History in the country -- people like Charles and Mary Byrd. Their suggestion to them is this, “Will they alter the manner in which they present their subject”” And, they get turned down, flatly.

So, they then decide that it is necessary for them to do as they say, i.e. “build our own stable of historians." Then, they approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in fellowships, and say” “When we find young men in the process of studying for doctorates in the field of American History, and we feel that they are the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say so? And the answer is, “Yes.”

So, under that condition, eventually they assemble twenty (20), and they take these twenty potential teachers of American History to London. There, they are briefed in what is expected of them -- when, as, and if they secure appointments in keeping with the doctorates they will have earned.

That group of twenty historians ultimately becomes the nucleus of the American Historical Association. And then, toward the end of the 1920's, the Endowment grants to the American Historical Association four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for a study of our history in a manner which points to what this country look forward to, in the future.

That culminates in a seven-volume study, the last volume of which is, of course, in essence, a summary of the contents of the other six. The essence of the last volume is this: the future of this country belongs to collectivism, administered with characteristic American efficiency.”

Charlotte Iserbyte is the expert on the dumbing down of American Students. Norman Dodd explains the origins. If you have not heard his interview I will link it.
https://youtu.be/8RgRGWlDo70N

Perhaps the judge had ambitions to the New Jersey supreme court. Perhaps it was federal. Once he became one of Fox News contributors his legal career was over. Perhaps judge Napolitano will be helpful in the exposing of the DNC dirty deeds in Ukraine. Perhaps, perhaps...
.

You have not lost your mind. Fox has made a turn left since the new administration. They have yet to complete the turn due to fear of losing the money making programs like Judge Pirro, Hannity, Tucker and a couple others. When they do, they be just another CNN or MSNBC and lose the audience that built the network and brought the advertisers. They will no longer be on the top of the cable network ratings. It's just a matter of time.

I'm near Sacto too. It's very sad to see the decline...

What is the purpose of the Dept of Education? They spend a lot of our tax dollars.