I see nothing in the proposed firearm legislation about stopping the Drug Cartel, Criminals, Criminal Syndicates, Blackmarketeers from illegally selling guns in major cities. What protection does the American citizen have if the Police are going to be hamstrung? Oh yes, the Democrat Syndicate wants to keep the populace in a state of fear. I hope the "legal firearm owners will organize resistance to such a draconian law. I was just at the local indoor range and query them about what's happening in the country, the reply was that people are buying a large number of firearms and ammo.

Thanks for an objective analysis of the two situations. Regardless of the difference between the public vs private nature of the two residences, the first group (with whom I am somewhat sympathetic) overstepped the bounds of the 1st amendment. Pounding on the windows, with the implied threat by carrying weapons is not "peaceable assembly," and they should have been told to disperse or face arrest.

The only thing these dogooders and those who they inflame understand is superior force.
Was it Mao who said "power comes from the barrel of a gun"

Just like the FBI , the DOJ ,and theJudicial Branch had been filled with criminals by the Satanic luciferian globalist pedos including Carter the Bushes , Kissmyassinger, the Clintonistas, and Hussein with Soros Rockefeller’s Paysuers Rothschilds and the rest of the 13 bloodlines financing these goons. They have also installed bad cops and Bad DA’s bad Governors bad Mayors. What a filthy swamp US has become.

The fake news , the UN , The globalists all are the enemy of the people. Line them all up and shoot them. The world would be far better off. IMO

In case there was any doubt how the UN would react:
United Nations Criticizes President Trump’s Response to Left-Wing Rioting in Portland, Other Cities
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/united-...

Blue helmets make nice targets

Would the UN be smart enough to refuse if Biden offered?
Afghanistan is a walk in the park compared to the US, imo.

Was there a difference because the governors mansion is a publicly owned building and the Atty Gen's home was a privately owned building? In the latter case the demonstrators were asked to leave and warned if they did not they would be arrested.
Trespass was one of the charges against them.
(I am no expert on the KY law.)

I agree with your assessment of a Biden administration's response. Whereas if Trump wins and we face this situation the UN would not be invited.

How long would it take for the United Nations to interfere in a civil war here? A Biden administration would invite them in, imo.

It's not always the Right who are victims. From Kentucky (via my niece who lives near there):

On May 24th, several hundred protesters stood on the porch of the Governor's mansion, many armed with rifles and demanding for him to come outside. This took place for nearly two hours while many beat on the glass windows of his home. The same group later that day hung an effigy of Governor Beshear from a tree. This group was made up primarily of middle-aged white males and they were protesting over COVID-19 restrictions. In response to this protest, they are now building a fence around the Governor's Mansion. ZERO ARRESTS WERE MADE.

On July 14th, 87 protesters sat in the front lawn in front of Attorney General Daniel Cameron's house. They were sitting in lines with their hands in their laps. This group was unarmed and made up of mostly young people both white and of color who were demanding justice for Breonna Taylor. Other than his grass no part of the Attorney General's home was touched. ALL 87 WERE ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH A FELONY.

Then they have laid the groundwork for the 2nd American Civil War

Read the bill in the House. It includes every gun control policy proposed in the last 50 years is in this bill, every single one. They are just waiting for Trump to leave, and potentially the Senate to switch to push it through.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-c...

If the Goverment attempts to disarm the citizenry I would like to think that there would be open revolt

This is why the people need to be disarmed, and may very likely be in January 2021.

There's a disturbing relationship between political dogooders and the lower income people, just as there is a discomfiting relationship between law enforcement institutions and the criminal element. In both there is a supplier-consumer element.

If the poor were made affluent, then there would be no need for the dogooders. If criminals were held in check, then there would be no need for lawyers and law enforcement. What happens is that the poor are promised affluence, then made subjects of dependency that insures they don't achieve independent wealth. In the same way, the law enforcement establishment promises "law and order," then instead makes life harder for the law abiding, because it's the acts of the criminals that keeps them employed.

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kinds of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted—and you create a nation of lawbreakers—and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

p. 436 ; Dr. Floyd Ferris to Hank Rearden in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged

Not to mention, standing by while innocent protestors, citizens in the course of doing their own business, getting harassed, getting beaten up by these marxist thugs.

From the article: The "criminalization of the law-abiding and innocent," Francis expounded, is achieved in such a state through: "exorbitant taxation, bureaucratic regulation; the invasion of privacy, and the engineering of social institutions, such as the family and local schools; the imposition of thought control through 'sensitivity training' and multiculturalist curricula; 'hate crime' laws; gun-control laws that punish or disarm otherwise law-abiding citizens but have no impact on violent criminals who get guns illegally; and a vast labyrinth of other measures."

This is exactly where we are. Where right is wrong and wrong is right.