Trump is really a THIRD PARTY candidate
Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 6 months ago to Politics
"A buried footnote with regards to Trump’s political career is that he made his first serious foray into the swamp as the presidential nominee in Ross Perot’s Reform Party in the 2000 elections. When those efforts fizzled out, Trump, aware that the road to the White House via a third-party platform was largely inaccessible, began to weigh his chances at running for the presidency on the Republican ticket. Not a bad idea considering that the last time a president was elected in the US who did not identify as either a Democrat or Republican was in 1848, with the election of Whig candidate Zachary Taylor. At the time, however, much of Washington wrote off the tycoon’s dream as a bad joke; the egoistic yearnings of a billionaire who thinks the White House is just another real estate venture.
But Capitol Hill seriously underestimated both the dark mood that had descended upon the nation, as well as Trump’s ability to capitalize on it. With an uncanny gift for electrifying audiences wherever he went, people no longer laughed at his political ambitions. Eventually, Trump went on to do what the polls said was virtually impossible – he defeated the veteran Washington insider, Hillary Clinton, becoming the 45th president of the US. At this point, Trump the ultimate interloper began to use the Republican Party as his own personal Trojan horse to enact radical changes that could not have been achieved otherwise.
For example, despite Washington’s bipartisan love affair with overseas entanglements, Trump held back the dogs of war. He has given the US military arguably its longest break from the battlefield in living memory."
But Capitol Hill seriously underestimated both the dark mood that had descended upon the nation, as well as Trump’s ability to capitalize on it. With an uncanny gift for electrifying audiences wherever he went, people no longer laughed at his political ambitions. Eventually, Trump went on to do what the polls said was virtually impossible – he defeated the veteran Washington insider, Hillary Clinton, becoming the 45th president of the US. At this point, Trump the ultimate interloper began to use the Republican Party as his own personal Trojan horse to enact radical changes that could not have been achieved otherwise.
For example, despite Washington’s bipartisan love affair with overseas entanglements, Trump held back the dogs of war. He has given the US military arguably its longest break from the battlefield in living memory."
It is a pleasant surprise to see some criticisms of Trump based on fact/opinion rather than hysteria.
- we’re keeping the oil
Yes, a criticism but trivial.
- selling massive amounts of military hardware to foreign states
Do not see this as a bad thing.
- the harmful sanctions that have been slapped against Iran
Only harmful against Iranian sponsored terrorism and their nuke development.
Many comments on the RT site show anti-Zionist pathology. The quality of RT comments has not kept up with increasing sense of the articles.
Only meritocracy improves the overall human condition. We must judge (yes, we must judge) people as individuals on their individual ability. Skin color, age, gender is not relevant. Only ability is relevant.
Some abilities appear to be partially related to skin color. For example, what is the skin color of most pro basketball players? That does not exclude very skillful people of other skin colors, but they are the exception. That is just reality, not racism. Neither is it gender discrimination that many brilliant mathematicians are male, nor is it age discrimination that there are very few video game programmers over 60 years old. The reality is that people have different strengths and sometimes they are related to physical attributes. No law will change this. No insistence on equality will change this. All that will happen is to cripple human advancement and destroy civilization, leaving only the law "Might makes right." That will mean enslavement of the great majority to the "chosen" few without equitable reward for skills or abilities.