One of the saddest/most pathetic/yet probably effective arguments the Dems are regurgitating is that putting ACB on SCOTUS would create a 6-3 Conservative majority.

Really? Roberts is a Conservative? Since when?

If Biden wins the Supreme Court could be a packed with two dozen Marxist Constitution shredders vrs X-number justices as yet not impeached for being group-think challenged.
Me dino is not laughing at what I just wrote. This Schiff has gone way beyond liberalism being a mental disorder. The now treasonous left has gone completely insane.

If she's not confirmed, a lot of mischief could happen between now and January.

I don't often get a thrill up my leg these days but give this a little thought. Trump wins 4 more years and there are at least 2 serving justices who want to retire. The balance will soon be 6-3 but could easily go to 8-1 and that my friends makes me giddy.

Me dino heard ACB say she would be no one's puppet and I'm taking her at her word. But she as a both a conservative Constitutionalist and a ninth justice should effectively offset future mischief by RINO Roberts.

As much as I do support confirming ACB there is absolutely nothing saying she would rule in favor of or against this case! Just because she is nominated by a R President has ZERO to do with how she might rule on any case as a Justice. That is made abundantly clear with many of the rulings by Roberts. On another note, this is a clear example of why we need to have the ninth Justice on the bench ASAP. 4-4 rulings are absolutely worthless.

Just in time for Halloween.

Ha! I just started reading some of those.

You make me dino think of creepy H.P. Lovecraft short stories. (-:

That could well simply be Robert's RINO motive.

How about a plain ole' me dino likes that? A lot!

He is acting out of the one motive even lower than altruism: spite. He's doing this to spite the President. Reason enough to remove him from the bench on impeachment for, and conviction of, injecting a personal bias into his rulings. We all know Judge Narragansett would never approve.

Just a note, but typically unless a judge is present for oral arguments they do not participate in the decision.

Your story does hit upon a major reason why the court needs a solid 5-4 majority: to rule against attempts at voter fraud. Remember that in the case of a 4-4 tie, the lower court ruling is upheld - meaning that all those activist judges Obama installed will continue to put out these unConstitutional rulings.

With all these activist judges, I'd almost like to see something written in to Article III of the Constitution to act as a check on these lower judges. It would be something like: "in the event that a higher court overrules the lower court judge, the higher court may also annotate the case to indicate a potential egregious error in judgment worthy of further review. A judge earning three of these annotations is summarily suspended and must be re-confirmed by Senate vote before being able to return to legal practice. Annotations may also be referred to the Supreme Court for comment, though the Supreme Court does not hold the power to either remove or confirm judges."

Thoughts?

Misses his secret lover, RBG, or DNC has pictures of him servicing a goat.

Looks like the committee vote will be tomorrow, and the final Senate vote somewhere between the 25th and the 30th, depending on whether the Dems throw any obstacles.

So, swearing in at the end of next week, probably.

Being intimidated by blackmail is not conducive to a sound mindset.

Yeah, swear her in, impeach Roberts and and replace that RINO with yet another Amy.
White conservative guys attract Gloria Allred crying chorus lines.

They've certainly go something on him. Who in the hell calls ACA "a tax" in their right mind?

Swear her in and impeach Roberts after Trump's victory?