The Danger of A Deceptive Press

Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 5 months ago to Politics
8 comments | Share | Flag

"We have seen this week the heads of these social media sites testifying before Congress and questioned as to why they censor only conservative users. Lying through their teeth they denied they picked on conservatives but neither could state a single liberal they have censored. Fresh off of censoring White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany for sharing a damning New York Post article about Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son, the far-left social media network has now censored U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Mark A. Morgan. On Wednesday, Morgan posted tweets celebrating the success of the Trump administration’s gradually expanding border wall.

One of the tweets he posted read as follows: “@CBP & USACEHQ continue to build new wall every day. Every mile helps us stop gang members, murderers, sexual predators, and drugs from entering our country. It’s a fact, walls work.”[2] The reason for censoring him, the tweet praising the effectiveness of the wall was “hateful”. I find it hard to understand why these big tech-heads think that doing things that benefit the country, the American people, and America’s economy are hateful.

It is obvious that they are in a position to ‘control the narrative’ and their narrative is to bring America into the one-world government. We have allowed people who don’t like America to be in control of what happens to America. Obama was the worst president we have ever had. The only people that prospered under his administration were the muslims. He gave them a free pass to come to America, that’s why we have scum in the US House of Representatives like Omar and Talib. Both have stated that we deserve the terrorist attacks we’ve experienced.

I have a hard time understanding why we allow anyone from the muslim faith to hold any kind of office in our government because they have to swear allegiance to our Constitution but they are not allowed to swear allegiance to anything but the koran. I believe that this should be looked into in-depth and resolved so that only people who defend America and her values be allowed to hold public office.

For its report, the Media Research Center did a lot of visual spadework. It viewed some 1,007 evening news stories about the Trump White House on ABC, CBS and NBC from June 1 to Sept. 30. That’s the equivalent of about 32.7 hours of coverage, by TV standards an eternity of news time.

What they found was, as Trump himself might say, sad: “Over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive.”[3]

We saw the grilling Trump went through over the phone call to Ukraine. He was even impeached for it but now we find out that they were terrified that he would expose the corruption of Joe Biden, which has gotten exposed big time, yet the media still refuses to cover it in any way. I believe the American people have the right to know just how much Biden sold out America while he was vice-president. Biden’s whole family profited from his position as vice-president yet none of the media will even ask the questions that need to be answered. It has been stated that Biden’s business dealings will be a national security threat for the United States if he becomes president.

It has become very obvious just how far the corruption has gone in DC. Republicans are not totally innocent but the Democrats seemed to have embraced it 100%. Even during the hearing Representative Crenshaw noted that not one single Democrat voiced disapproval of how Twitter and FaceBook have violated out First Amendment rights. Something to keep in mind when voting for the next couple of years. We need people that will stand up for the American way and our rights the way that Trump has and will continue to do for the next four years.
SOURCE URL: https://newswithviews.com/the-danger-of-a-deceptive-press/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 5 months ago
    With respect to these companies Freedom of Speech, I like some parts of the Section 230 protections; however, they can't have it both ways:

    a. They can allow complete freedom of people posting, with the exception of illegal activities, and receive the protections of Section 230, or
    b. They can audit and control content to their hearts desires, but no longer receive protections under Section 230 - If they control content, they are liable for what is on their site.

    This is just like what I used to say to my kids: "You can be a kid or you can be an adult. If you act like a kid, then you get to make a kid's decisions. If you act like an adult, you get to make adult's decisions. However, you can not act like a kid, and get to make adults decisions."
    Freedom should be maximized, but it is only appropriate up to the level one is responsible for the consequences of freely made decisions. Freedom and Responsibility are two sides of the same coin.

    Let's see which company monopolizes the market, the one that lets free content on, or the one's that censor (and are held responsible for slander/libel, etc).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ BobCat 4 years, 5 months ago
    Hang on to your hats .... we are about to find out just how truly dangerous it is for Liberty to tolerate a monopolistic and corrupt press.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 4 years, 5 months ago
    Twitter, Jack Dorsey froze the account of the New York Post for printing a story about Hunter Biden's laptop, but says the ayatollah’s tweet about the Holocaust not ever happening is covered by free speech. If there ever was a company that needs oversight it is Twitter.

    https://worldisraelnews.com/at-senate...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 4 years, 5 months ago
      Twitter, Google, and Facebook have violated the unwritten agreement to be unbiased with users postings. That censorship must be eliminated. Perhaps only a super-majority (greater than 75%) of all users of the service should be able to inhibit posts. That would allow all sides of any issue to express their approval and disapproval without any censorship by the owner of the site. It appears that would likely result in very few opinionated comments being censored. It would have to allow days or weeks for such a process to take place. imo, none of the censorship would have occurred if this system was in place, and government would not have to intervene.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 5 months ago
    If the Democrat elite think they can control the fall-out from their actions, they are truly pathetic. All their money can't protect them. I don't fear the outcome, I have always taken care of myself but I find myself almost pitying their rude awakening.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo