11

The entire point of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) is transparency. The Buy-dem FDA is purposely breaking that law to Hide the Dangers of Vaccines From People They Would Force To Be Vaccinated.

Posted by freedomforall 4 years, 1 month ago to Politics
17 comments | Share | Flag

No one should have to take a vaccine or any other treatment without access to the known effects of that vaccine or treatment.

Excerpt:
"The Executive Branch gave Pfizer $1.95 billion in taxpayer funds to promote development of its vaccine through an advance-purchase agreement. (App000340 ¶ 11.) It then paid Pfizer more than $15.7 billion collected from the American people to purchase that product. (App000340-App000341 ¶¶ 12-16.) Thereafter, it spent $18.75 billion more of the American people’s money promoting that product. (App000341 ¶¶ 17-19.) Yet, when it comes to being transparent with those same American people, the FDA claims it cannot muster the resources to timely produce the same documents it reviewed for licensure in 108 days. Just as the government found the resources for Operation Warp Speed, it must now do the same to produce these critical documents with the same warp speed. How about the federal government spend just 0.1% of the taxpayer money it has given Pfizer – that would be at least $17.6 million – a pittance compared to the billions given to Pfizer and more than sufficient to hire enough reviewers to timely produce the documents. Companies in private litigation produce hundreds of thousands of pages per month in discovery, reviewing each document for privilege, etc. But yet the vast federal government, on an issue this important, claims it cannot find the resources. A product the administration says everyone must take under penalty of exclusion from American life and for which they cannot even sue Pfizer if injured! Whose interests is the executive branch protecting, the American people or its own?

Reflecting that the FDA can, in fact, produce documents at a far greater rate than 500 pages per month, on December 1, 2021, in an effort to avoid the hearing with this Court, it offered to produce approximately 12,658 pages, 4 .txt files, and 4 SAS files within a period of 61 days if PHMPT would agree to thereafter only receive 500 pages per month. (App000341 ¶ 20.) The FDA does not appear to recognize the gravity of its ethical breach to the American people in playing these games."


All Comments

  • Posted by Vlad_ben_Avorham 4 years, 1 month ago
    This surprises anyone? Now that robotics has gotten good enough to replace us in the factories, or will in the next decade, the Elites have found a new use for us.... medical experimentation, as they engage in their quest for immortality.

    Welcome to your new destiny lab rat
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ErikAZ 4 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    OK I see now they want 75 years. That is ridiculous. I read in a Reuters the department that handles FOIA reviews at FDA has 10 employees and currently is processing 400+ other FOIA reviews. But the article said the plantiffs in the case include researchers and scientists from some of the best labs and universities in the country (and the EU). While I don't trust most people to do their own research as moat people don't have the education and knowledge to understand things like immunology, these plantiffs do. As far as I'm concerned they should do a Wikileaks style "dump" of all the documents to these experts and let them report their findings.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ErikAZ 4 years, 1 month ago
    Have they said how long it will take them for full disclosure?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ mwolff 4 years, 1 month ago
    Perhaps a counter to the delay would be to hold specifically the manufacturer and secondarily the FDA liable for ALL injuries from the Vaccine until that all the data is released. I doubt any of the pharmaceutical companies would survive the so called 75 years to gather the data as the liabilities would wipe them out within a few years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 4 years, 1 month ago
    Also, WHAT is in those papers that is not already protected by all of their patents? anybody using that information to "steal" their well-known techniques is eligible to be sued for it.

    To that point, if you stole the formula for Coca-Cola, and offered it to Pepsi. Pepsi would, in fact, TURN YOU IN! (I think this may have already happened, LOL).

    So, this constant HIDING, when we PAID FOR IT. It is OUR INFORMATION, not the Governments information. It is OURS!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ben_C 4 years, 1 month ago
    Last night on Fox News I actually heard a statement made by a former White House Staff Physician say what I learned in veterinary school fifty plus years ago. "Viruses mutate and become more infectious but less pathologic over time." This is virology / epidemiology 101. But this DOES NOT fit the democrats agenda to control elections with mail in votes etc. Sooner or later the sheepole will realize the scam and rebel - hopefully not too late.
    Also, I am calling the "vaccine" when talking with my friends and clients "you mean the genetic modifier?"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 4 years, 1 month ago
    Why are there ANY redactions? I could carry out the paper copies this week, myself.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 4 years, 1 month ago
    I stopped manufacturing medical devices when the FDA took over and I saw how they operated. It wasnt worth the aggravation. Our government is our enemy now, not our savior. and we should resist any and all attempts of the government to grow
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I actually shed a tear for our country yesterday. A group of 50 young students marching down the street with a bevy of guards and police cars protecting them. They were a religious group celebrating our Christmas Season. N
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Hey we still have our old Oak Tree (it's now almost 200 years old and gorgeous). And Ace Hardware is only two blocks away! When a group of protesters recently gathered in our town, the Police Department occupied the roof of City Hall and the Protesters decided to leave.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 4 years, 1 month ago
    The judge should rule that a 75-year delay proposal to an approved FoI request is contempt of court.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 4 years, 1 month ago
    -cough cough- I knew the whole charade was expensive -cough cough- but I'm choking on the enormity of the taxpayer outlay so far AND I'm willing to bet that's not all. I'd say a trip down to Ace Hardware to pick up a hank of rope and put it to good use on some of these traitorous bastards in the public square under the ol' oak tree may be in order. Then we can see if the remaining traitors and thieves can cough up the real facts in much less than 55 years. Miracles CAN be made to happen, ya know! LOL!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 4 years, 1 month ago
    Pfizer wants 75 years to pass before they release the details on their vaccine. Really? Why?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo