Did the US (Deep State D.C. fools) commit acts of war on Russia?

Posted by freedomforall 10 months ago to Politics
39 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"The news says that America just cluster-bombed Russian beachgoers in Crimea. Well, it didn’t say exactly that. But – nonetheless – that is exactly what just happened.

The Keeeeeeeeeeeeevians may have pushed the proverbial button that sent the missiles on their way but it was America – more finely, the regime that rules Americans – that provided the missiles and (apparently) the support needed to guide them to their target.

Bluntly – in honest language – America just attacked Russia.

It is nothing less than astounding that Russia has not attacked back. Yet. But – of a certainty – it’s coming. Because that is what happens when a country is attacked. It hits back – in self-defense – at the country that attacked it."
----------------------------------------------
D.C. is run by TRAITORS who want total control over everyone including all Americans and are intent on starting a nuclear war to maintain power. D.C. NIFO


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree that it's irrational to expect Ukraine not to use weapons against targets in the country that has invaded them.
    Complete foolishness, which is what I expect from Buydem and his puppeteers (given that I completely disagree with their goals to enslave me.)
    But I disagree that Russia is completely at fault for the invasion. NATO (US Deep State) played a large part in their actions against Russia since the USSR collapsed.
    Russia could have been treated as an ally starting 30 years ago and none of this would have happened, but the power mad sociopaths in the west must spread fear
    and Russia is a great target to use to compel Americans and Europeans to allow more concentration of power as a reaction to fear propaganda. Damn neocon scum.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Me dino predicts that should Trump beat the cheat and again becomes president, that war will come to an almost as quick end one way or the other.
    Doubt we won't have to worry about Taiwan either unless unless China makes a move the beat the attempted cheat.
    Just sayin'.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 months ago
    Russia wants no part in a fight with the US. They will be gone in 20 minutes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jack1776 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Right, the wrong munitions. I said from what I hear, meaning unsubstantiated. I know nothing other than the flaky article I read. I’m saying I’m concerned this will escalate. All large wars begin this way and it look like our government is doing it intentionally. A mistake, sure, two, maybe, one after another is deliberate. Our government is corrupt to the core.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sometimes you have to make choices with different unpleasant outcomes, so hopefully you choose the least unpleasant. Being on either side of a conflict has to be weighed in terms of the end game. If we let Russia keep using the threat of nuclear war to bully us into submission, Ukraine won't be the last victim.

    Biden isn't the only corrupt head of state we've had. The republic has been in danger of becoming a totalitarian state since President John Adams attempted sweeping punishments for anyone daring to criticize his government (the Sedition Act).

    I was uncertain about where we should be going until Sweden and Finland very quickly dropped neutrality. Those countries have better insight into the Russian Federation and Putin's aims than anyone else.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    actions have consequences

    you mean like the biden admin's corruption?

    like 0bama's over-throw of the government of Ukraine??

    like all the money and equipment sent to Ukraine and never account for

    those actions????

    i no not blame Ukraine for not wanting to be part of Russia, based on the last 100 years

    history:: the US fought a Civil War over this issue, The South had every right to leave the Union, for the wrong reasons

    thousands died in that stupid war and the result was the South was stuck

    so, do we stat WW3 to show that a country next to Russia is screwed??
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov 10 months ago
    Actions have consequences. Russia has been pounding Ukraine's power grid, hospitals, schools, and agricultural centers non-stop, but the international community (US included) cautions Ukraine not to retaliate beyond their own borders. Beyond nonsense!

    The old English saying "in for a penny, in for a pound" applies here. Once NATO decided to support Ukraine, any weapons they provide should be used as effectively as possible, and ATACMS is a very effective weapon, which Ukraine has been using to destroy Russian air defense systems in Crimea and elsewhere. That strategy is aimed at making temporary air superiority possible for use of the coming F-16 and Mirage fighters.

    Russia has been careless in where its air defense missiles land, so the claim that an ATACMS hit Crimean beachgoers is more likely a case of a failed S-300/400 missile landing after missing its target.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ATACMS is a surface to surface ONLY missile
    long range (well, longer that MRLS)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-140...

    The MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS; pronounced /əˈtækəmz/) is a tactical ballistic missile designed and manufactured by the US defense company Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV), and later Lockheed Martin through acquisitions. It uses solid propellant and is 13 feet (4.0 m) long and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter, and the longest-range variants can fly up to 190 miles (300 km).[9] The missiles can be fired from the tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the wheeled M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jack1776 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I’ve been looking for the original source and I can’t find it again; it was from this guy:
    https://www.youtube.com/@CanadianPrep...
    What he said was that the US helped Ukraine to target with satellite data used the wrong missile to bring down a Russian drone. I think he said ATACMS. If I find it again, I’ll post the link. My point is we are being drawn into this conflict.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jack1776 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    by the way, yes it stupid at best, but more than likely intentional provocation to trigger NATO article 5. We have enough technology to know that was going to happen before it was okay to fire.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jack1776 10 months ago
    From what I heard, the Ukraine shot down a drone with a US weapon, targeting data was provided by the US. Shrapnel took out the civilians.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by nonconformist 10 months ago
    It sounded like it had something to do with a malfunction of some kind due to them being shot down by anti air.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mhubb 10 months ago
    i just have no words....

    for such stupidity

    whatever the reason/cause, Russia invaded Ukraine
    they should expect blow-back

    but pushing the world to WW3 is simply not a sane act b our so-called government
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo