All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    That's already happening now. At least Trump is alerted that they'll keep trying.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ Abaco 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    Yeah...If it collapses I think the left will physically try to eliminate their competition.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    Rand's prolonged affair with Nathaniel Branden suggests that sexual fidelity was not that important to her.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by $ jdg 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    I think you've left out a big one. Libertarians run the gamut of belief and non-belief, not just in religion but in a lot of oddball practices including the occult. Rand (and Peikoff) did not see beliefs like those as harmless but as signs of irrationality and superstition that lead to Communism and fascism. To me that is Rand falling for the post-hoc fallacy, but it was a major show-stopper for her.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    It depends on what you mean by collapsing. If Harris and her handlers were to win, I would expect to see a Latin American style dictatorship, with no civil rights and no dissent allowed, If we get there we're stuck there indefinitely, unless some outside power intervenes and saves us by installing a new Pinochet.

    No, the notion of splitting the country, or at least making it much less centralized, can't happen if Harris wins. It would require someone like Trump to roll back Biden's changes, but then to see that coexistence with the far-left can't be stable.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment deleted.
  • Posted by craigerb 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    The theory that voting to make the pendulum swing wider will result in it swinging back sooner.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    I am 79 and I cant wait for the disaster of the decline to bottom out and perhaps see a resurrection of decent ideas. So, I would rather slow down the decline. after 4 years, the decline will continue though, because the intellectual basis of our society is rotten to the core
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    AR would surely pillory me for saying this, BUT. Common sense and using the test of what works in reality is a pretty good guide to life. Thats what I use day to day, and I think Trump does the same. I have read Objectivist theories, but they are a bit much for a lot of people. Common sense isnt that difficult.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by VetteGuy 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    I think your #5 sums up my feelings pretty close. The Decline is coming. The choice is Slow it down [Trump] or speed it up [Harris].
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes. And I give credit to Trump for that. He thinks the country is worth it. I am not so sure that I would agree with that. We only live so long and to waste life juices in a continual fight like this seems a lost cause. The economy will surely crash if leftists policies are continually implemented, and maybe we should just wait for that to happen. Shrugging surely accelerates that.....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    I think that Ayn Rand was into 100% or zero when it came to intellectual ideas. I think she felt libertarians were sort of on board, but intellectually compromised.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    Trump is basically a good guy, but definitely intellectually compromised in the pursuit of actually getting things done. I dont think the general voting populace is ready for a john galt. I wont live forever and if I can get a 60% john galt, its better than 0% john galt (harris).

    The basic reason for a republic instead of a democracy is to prevent the lowest denominator of people from taking over as they are right now.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 6 months, 1 week ago in reply to this comment.
    8) Trump will get government off the a$$es of the producers here and won't support the money-grabbing "green agenda". Another definite plus.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo