

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
I have *no* issue about shooting a Wild Boar. None whatsoever. They're as sneaky and hardheaded as a Washington Politician... and almost as dangerous!
My "standard hunting backup" sidearms were always S&W's in 357... one on each side. (And yes, I can shoot both dominant and weak handed...)
I used to only have one, but once in the Monterey, CA, area on a pig hunt, having had a wild boar take 5 of those to the head before it realized it might be fatally wounded before dropping, I discovered I really, REALLY wanted a backup! ((Scared? You bet your butt I was!!!)
Since moving to the mountains, however, I decided to upgrade to a 44 mag. Takes a *lot* more concentration (for me at least) to pull off multiples with said hand cannon, but at least I feel that a bear might respect the added horsepower that the "mosquito-shooters" didn't have.
I'm giving serious thought to stopping contributions to my 401K and buying junk silver coins.
Actually, a coworker was a *huge* fan of the Seacamp 32.. It was a nicely built and very concealable firearm, but putting my life (or that of my loved ones) in the hands of a 32 is kinda like putting it in the hands of a 25. (I do have a 25 that fits well in my evening purse, but again, you need (a) an *excellent* sight picture, and (b) a range of about 6 inches for it to be anyway effective... ;) )
Load more comments...