Ebola. Now she has it, now she doesn't?
Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 6 months ago to Politics
When will the truth be made public?
This is one more example of hiding the truth about Ebola.
No explanation whatsoever, but now the Dallas nurses are "cured."
This is one more example of hiding the truth about Ebola.
No explanation whatsoever, but now the Dallas nurses are "cured."
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Seriously, will Pham be involved in a fatal "accident" sooner, or later?
Saturday they stated that Pham is going to play with her dog. The dog is supposed to be in quarantine. Were they planning to dress her in full protective garb and to use proper procedures to protect her and clean up afterward? Who will be paying the thousands of dollars for this cute idiotic photo-op?
Dallas city officials apparently overruled that idiocy on Saturday, but the Dallas judge still continued his happy talk:
Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins issued a statement Friday saying Pham would be able to see her dog Saturday but City officials supervising the dog’s care said no and Jenkins acknowledged Saturday that experts decided it would be a bad idea.
“There’s no risk to her to be around the dog, but the top veterinarians in the state say the regimen we have the dog on, on monitoring, needs to not be interrupted and that the excitement of seeing her, and the separation anxiety when she would leave the quarantine area would be detrimental to their monitoring,” Jenkins said.
La-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la-la.
point that even good news is suspect. it's like the
turd in the punchbowl principle -- you just lose
your appetite for the whole buffet. -- j
p.s. we are soooooo glad that Nina and Amber
are doing well == this is not negative about
them, in any way at all !!!
These guys are supposed to be the top in the world and instead of speaking accurately about ebola they have been making vague reassuring statements (that have been subsequently shown to be false or inaccurate). (eg the assurance that any US hospital had SOP's that would allow it to handle ebola patients safely.)
I feel that they are subscribing to the "do not tell the little people anything that will scare them" philosophy. The result of this is that their own reputation is being trashed. Ebola is not a 'bad' disease insofar as transmission is concerned, but their behavior increases the danger as the public looses confidence in the medical system. Plagues are a numbers game and they must be handled correctly. We know how to do this; it is no secret. What we are now doing is a great job of botching this.
Jan
Giving people information and means to act on it prevents panic. Panic comes from lack of information and/or feeling trapped.
I have not followed this. I don't have high expectations of gov't. What is CDC doing wrong at this time?
We are not sheep. I have spent the 39 years between 1975 and now in the medical industry - the first 17 of those years working at the bench in laboratories. The CDC was god to us. Now I am going around shouting, "Feet of clay! Feet of CLAY!"
The CDC has some of the top brains in clinical pathology in the world. Now they are acting like brainless adolescent politicians (maybe a redundant phrase). What I am seeing from my seat is the philosophy, "The little people are too dumb to handle the real facts. We will tell them just what they 'need' to know so that they will react in the manner we think they should." and then "Woops. The 'little people' are literate and the internet is ubiquitous. Hey - they keep turning up with inconvenient facts that we had intended to conceal!"
Big Loss of Veracity time for the CDC! They are going to have to work very hard to salvage their reputations after this. Or not.
Jan
I interpreted CircuitGuy's email to mean that the probability of survival of someone who has already survived is "1". We have (fortunately) a very small sample volume and two people surviving can be just the luck of the odds.
Jan, not a mathematician
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73HkgjGDA...
For healthy people, who identify infection early in the cycle, who are cared for and have modern techniques used (evidently, Nina Pham had a blood transfusion from the doctor who had earlier survived, thus enhancing her own body's ability to fight the infection), then survival seems to be rather high.
The real issue is not survival, but initial infection. Since it has a relatively long incubation period, then a very virulent form of contagion, keeping the outbreak contained to a level where proper care can be given is the key. This makes quarantining those at risk of exposure for a time period longer than the incubation period, essential. Otherwise we risk the situation where the medical resources would be overwhelmed, and survival rates would skyrocket.
Load more comments...