Confusion

Posted by samrigel 10 years, 5 months ago to Government
36 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I need some serious help!! It is alleged that Chinese hackers can bring down our power grid. Wacko Al Bagdadi has said he is going to attack the US homeland. North Korean wants to Nuke us while Iran is building a Nuke to do the same. Our Veterans must wait for much needed healthcare in a system fraught with corruption and nepotism. But the only focus coming from Obama is the legalization of people who DO NOT belong in this country and who would have been shot entering Guatamala or Iran. What am I missing?????


All Comments

  • Posted by 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Worse than the explosion" I guess that would depend on where you were standing when it goes off!! ;-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The water would absorb a lot of energy. On board an aircraft would be better. An air burst would cause an EMP which would be even worse than the explosion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Container ship off the coast is pretty easy and pretty tough to stop until its in lethal range...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually I didn't even think about Holder, but Holder quit, Hagel was fired. Hagel was the only "R" the administration, perhaps I should say the last "r"., but probably the only "R" that tried to get along with Obama and his team. It's just a WAG to figure out what the "O" Team is going to do next.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jabuttrick 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I assumed he was one of the people you referred to when you said Obama was "cleaning out anyone that might oppose him politically in even the smallest sense" since he is the only other cabinet member to resign recently. And, I should note, your opinion that Hagel was replaced because Obama wants to replace him with an "appeas[er]" seems backwards from the political reality. Hagel internally opposed ramping up the intervention in Iraq, Syria and Afganistan. Look for him to replaced by a more hawkish type who will go along with increasing the number of American "boots on the ground" there.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 5 months ago
    the huge vote of NO on 4nov -- which many are
    trying to negate with their spin. -- j

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 10 years, 5 months ago
    Some of you have confused the idea of 'nuking us' with dropping nuclear bombs on our land and making it a radioactive wasteland.

    No, the real danger today could be the EMP (electromagnetic pulse) that occurs when a nuclear weapon is set off, especially at high altitudes.

    No radioactive fallout to speak of, but EVERY electronic gizmo, from your PC to the computers in your cars to every computer remotely related to your life can have its little electronic brain permanently fried.

    And you'd need electronic gizmos to create the repair parts... think about that impact.

    China and maybe North Korea could do that; Mideast Loons, not so much. I don't think China would see any sense in doing that, other than maybe shipping a billion or so of their citizens over here to repopulate the US and Canada after we all kill each other rioting for food, clothing and shelter, but NK... not so much. Their 'leaders' are really from another planet.

    We'll see what happens...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 10 years, 5 months ago
    Since Obama is stripping the Military bare will give all radicals in obtaining a nuke and blowing one of our cities to hell. Oh, maybe the Pres private army Homeland Security will save us all!!!!
    This is personnel army is unconstitutional also. But just you wait! The Pres is going to ruin all the legal gun owners Christmas. He will probably issue an Executive Order to accept the UN Gun Ban Treaty (Dec. 24th). Civil War 2, starting in January or February 2015? That's right the hooligans of Homeland Security will stop it!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 10 years, 5 months ago
    no, your problem is that you may have too much reality.
    now, what are you going to do about THAT?
    Personally, I'm going to take some serious pain meds and have a snack.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I say things that make sense all the time. Knock of your constant stream of snide personal attacks. They don't belong here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JCLanier 10 years, 5 months ago
    Samrigel:
    You are already on the right track by posing the question.
    I think jlc gave you sound advice.
    The immigration situation is a critical point and could get worse... Who knows how far Mr. O can take this. Hopefully, the opposition will be fearce!
    Hang in there with the rest of us!
    JC
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jabuttrick 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry for the mixup. Boy, I must have missed the times where Holder and Hagel "oppose[d] [Obama] politically." Can you give examples?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Opps, the replies were not mine, but from other Gulchers. What I meant is that Obama is cleaning out anyone that might oppose him politically in even the smallest sense. He's probably going to send his people over there to appease the people that hate us. This is a sick world and something needs to be done to change it's direction. His appointee this time will be someone that totally agrees with his agenda of appeasement. All they have to do is lie to get confirmed and then they can do whatever he (BO) wants.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 5 months ago
    you are missing nothing. what you have just described is what is in fact taking place in the nation. therefore the question to ask is what do we the people do about it? at this point i give up.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks jlc, all or most of what you suggest I have implemented............I trust almost no one!!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jabuttrick 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sometimes hard to tell. Anyway you have now clarified what you meant when you used the phrase "one of his own." Thanks.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Jan: The most effective attack would be an EMP. No need to kill us outright, when removing the means of living will do the job much more effectively.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    How do you figure they're several years away from a nuclear bomb? All reports indicate only months. Now, an effective ICBM, I might agree with, but there are many more ways of delivery than a rocket.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo