Obviously did not read my post nor the article I linked too. SInce forbes says teh corporate average is 28% in the uS based on data, you once again lie. Read the article

If it were untrue, it would be libel not slander.

Your posts were deleted when you were.
So our very competent readers will have to decide which of us is the more believable.

Of course, one of the admins could always chime in and confirm my claim, but they are probably sitting back, just like they did last time, giving you enough rope to hang yourself with.

And, as last time, I'm just sitting by the bank of the river, watching the water roll by, and laughing.

"You will not go out into the wild and make your own way, you will insist that others have the obligation to make your way for you." cant have said it better myself, i think it needs to be said again. regarding social obligation i'm going to assume your referring to things like taxes? i think obligations like taxes have a way of serving oneself although big problems arise when the government over reaches its boundaries and tries to tax everything from boos to hiking up in the woods someplace sometimes just to have a form of control over the market or rake in extra cash, that said it is also self serving as it is used to help maintain the parks you hiked in or help regulate volatile business and use that money to help lower taxing in other areas overall, again the main concern is government overreaching its authority interfering in the natural order of things, such as survival of the fittest as example.

Marx didn't define work through intelligence or effort. He defined it through time.

You show the lack of brain within your head.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/20...

Number one economic problem in the US is our corporate tax rates, they are the highest in the world at 35%, even china has reduced them from 33% to 25%. You want jobs here, it has to be cost effective to do business here. Even adjusted for tax breaks its still 28% and china gives breaks as well.

I wont be responding to you again. Its not worth my time as you are obviously unable to read and understand what you read.

Here is where liberals become hypocrites...

By what religion, creed or ideaology do you define what "obligations" each person has? And what gives YOU the power to define them for anyone else?

You see, those exact questions are what makes you equivilent to the "fundamentalist", jihadist, crusader, etc. What you don't want to admit is you have your own belief of what I should do as a societal obligation, and believe that through the force of government you have the right to make me do it. It is what turns "humanist idealists" into murderous communists.

Mmmm... and who determines whom gets what according to marxism? That is the core problem you must overcome.

"Any "slavery" or "screwing over hard workers" that's taken place has been caused by government intrusion into the private sector, and that is demonstrable even through the most cursory evaluation of history. "
That's not entirely true. In the early days of industry, especially the coal mines, workers got charged for their company houses and company tools up front, so that they started out in debt to the company, and were paid in company scrip that couldnt be used anywhere else. The one thing I thank unions for, although I think they've long outlived their usefulness.

So What percentage do you keep for marketing and growth? 30%, 12% what percentage is it?

Based off your earlier posts you would keep to little and your company would ultimately fail when hard times hit it because you would not have the capital to ride out the storms.

Do you share equally in all the pay? Does everyone get the same money for whatever job they do? If not you are behaving differently in your company than your posts would say you believe.

If you are paying everyone the same how do you keep good talent and still maintain a proffit to pay your investors/owners for their investment? Because differences in pay between the bairly get the job done employee and the do more than is required employee have to be great enough to keep the latter around or they find something that pays better and they are gone.

How do you solve these problems with Marxist ideals? I would love to know because I do not believe they can be solved with Marxist ideals.

The very fact that you would the term of Economic justice to describe stealing from the rich to give to the poor is appalling. Theft is never just and economic justice is nothing more than a thug with a very large club stealing from one person to give it to another.

Do you think that if I had a neighbor with two cars and one with no car and I stole one of my neighbors cars to give to the neighbor with no car I should not go to jail for theft?

Such an act would be the entity of me doing exactly what economic justice has the entity of the government doing. So why is OK for the entity of the government but not for the entity of me?

Until we live in a land where the same law applies equally to all entities rich or poor, black or white... regardless of differences there can be no justice of any kind. That applies to all entities within the land, Corporate entities, individuals and government entities. In a land that follows the rule of law, theft no matter who the thief is, is wrong.

I wanted to thank you for your effort in writing this JeanPaulZodeaux because I enjoyed reading it. Hopefully you enjoy reading something I share at some point as much as I would like to give you value for value I received here.

I found this particularly well written.

Thanks You

As much as I hate to admit this, I dont really like the John Galt charter in the book. I like Fransicso and Dagny and in particular Hank Reardon. Ragnar is awesome to.

While I agree with the premises of the book and really enjoy it, the character of John Galt is one that I just never liked all that well. He started the strike, and ends it but otherwise he just does not grab me at all.

That being said the article is well from someone who obviously does not understand real world and only the theoretical world. John Galt and the idea of a gultch is fantasy, I think we all realize it, but dam its good to have a fantasy to dream about.

The difference is my fantasy is a world where everyone trades value for value and is so honest in there dealings with other men that no government is needed. In this world a person who owns a steel mill would put pollution controls on it not because a government forced him to but because pouting the environment to the point of destroying it is bad for himself.

This persons fantasy is a world where the people are slaves to the government and do what they should because if they do not they get killed, go to jail, get beat up with the billy club of choice....

the bottom line is I believe in the individual, and their ability to recognize and act upon what is best for them. I believe that natural consequences for actions will catch up to and teach those that fail to recognize what action is best for them, if those natural consequences are not altered by society.

The guy who wrote this article does not believe that the average person can learn and grow and reach a point where they will make good choices for themselves. If he does his writing indicates otherwise.

Entitlement brings out the worst in people, working for and keeping what you earn brings out the best. Those who do not understand this want entitlements; those that do want compensation based on the value they produce.

We have a troll

Irrelevant because her imperfection as a person is NOT a litmus test to the truth of her ideals. We might as well throw out the constitution because Jefferson had slaves...That is the logic of your statement.

Everytime I read idiots like this, and find their thesis, you realize they never even got the point.

#1 Galt isn't ACTING "entitled" and whining...he freakin IS entitled to the profits of his work which is getting STOLEN from the industrialists.

#2 Yes there are new industrialists ready to step up and TRY to take Galt's place...but the books entire point is that Government and the "entitled" lazy asses of the world are RIPPING THEM OFF and creating laws making success in new businesses almost impossible...this is NOT a false theme, it is the result of socialism/communism as proved by EVERY socialist/communist state...so the proof is there.

This guy is an idiot arguing from a false premise.

Absolutely it did happen.
In fact, I was one of the people who tipped off the admins to your post where you made your outrageous claim.