Today's cartoon | Personal Liberty

Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years, 3 months ago to Entertainment
62 comments | Share | Flag

Neither for me thank you very much.

All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I won't call any leftist "liberal" OR "progressive". They are dead-set against both liberty and progress.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Everybody in national politics gets trash talked. Palin has shown she can't take it, so she shouldn't be a candidate again.

    But I'd marry her in a heartbeat. Or subscribe if she gets her own TV show.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed. I usually say progressive instead of liberal but for some silly reason failed this time. My bad.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Makes communicating clearly problematic - one of the objectives of the thought police and use of double-speak.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It sounds like we are in agreement. Yes I was using the word liberal in the bastardized meaning.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually, Ed, most conservatives are not socially liberal (that would mean that they advocate for more liberty on social issues, not less). They are economically liberal. And of course, I use the term "liberal" in the classical meaning - as in liberty, not the bastardized current meaning of socialist/progressive.

    I like your original position of "constitutional libertarian." What the Constitution spells out for powers, nothing more, and all else is up to the states/individuals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by amhunt 10 years, 3 months ago
    Yes -- disaster A or disaster B?
    Both need to be discarded NOW!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am not sure that is possible. The trouble I have with conservatives is most are socially liberal. That leads to more programs and less individual freedom. I believe that a constitutional libertarian is the best choice because they believe in a very limited government, the rule of law and hold individuals right to choose in very high esteem. Personally I feel electing people with these values is the best choice if we are to ever get back to the original founders vision for America.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree! Personally I prefer a constitutional libertarian. They believe in a limited government and individual freedom to make their own choices.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    When they feel enough pain. IMHO it has to get much worse before it is ever going to get better.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 10 years, 3 months ago
    There has to be better than these two. If that is all this country can produce WE THE PEOPLE are in real trouble...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 10 years, 3 months ago
    these power-hungry people disgust me. -- j

    p.s. Washington took the job reluctantly, to
    perpetuate the goodness in the nation,
    and he could see it clearly. . can anyone
    in power see that value, now???

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by teri-amborn 10 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I concur...however the current atmosphere of fear and reaction in this country is much more "flight" than "fight".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 3 months ago
    Hear ye, hear ye, peons of the vassal states! Hear ye!,
    Hear ye to know ye that two great royal houses shall contend for the crown in the Year of Our Lord 2016.
    Who shall rule the Oval Office Throne? Which pair of pants shall it be?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by samrigel 10 years, 3 months ago
    Absolutely NO MORE Clintons or Bushs in the White House, time for a truly Conservative change and they ain't it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 3 months ago
    i think it is irrelevant which of them wins, we are already on the road to socialism/fascism and neither of them would ever try and stop it.
    when the economy collapses their money will not have any value either.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo