No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning
It appear that science is never settled. I have to wonder though - perhaps its my human limitation - how something could always be without ever beginning? Interesting position, it kind of makes you wonder about God.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
However, I can prove that in the absence of same, man will assume that mantle - hence, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, etc. Show me a society without a recognized supreme being, and I'll show you that it has a human that has assumed the mantle.
So if one cannot prove a negative (that there is NO Supreme Being,) please demonstrate how you can prove the opposite... That there IS one (or more, or any...)
Atheists would like nothing better than a cogent argument to prove that! Really! We just never seem to receive any!
Go for it!!
What did you really mean to say? :)
What you just said, blarman, can too easily be applied to 'discussions' of the same aspects of Religion!
Shields Up!
:)
If new facts or observations turn up that prove conclusively that The Theory has holes in it, first, the Theory, like most others, is tweaked to see if it can, with internally consistent logic, account for the 'new discoveries.'
If it can't, it gets tossed and hopefully replaced with something more inclusive and accurate. If the tweaks appear to work, the tweaks are then open to experimental verification or rejection, too!
And even today, there are other 'theories' competing with TBB Theory to 'explain what we see and measure right now.'
Hell, the observation of the theorized Higgs Boson doesn't EXPLAIN 'how gravity works' any more than the discovery of the electron 'EXPLAINS' how electricity or electrostatic attraction WORKS, either!
:) But those are some of the Real Fun Challenges in Science!
Coincidence? Untrue? Created By God to fool/mislead/annoy us? Or yes, the way chemical elements naturally interact makes it quite probable that they will combine in ways that, with appropriate energy supplies and environments, can and will lead to what we call "life."
You, again, seem to postulate that, Man Will Assume The Role of The Supreme Being If No Supreme Being [Really] Exists. That Deocentric view implicitly assumes The Existence OF a Supreme Being (God) in the face of atheists' search for proof that one actually exists. Belief of the Existence of a Supreme Being is, to atheists, NOT 'proof' of the Existence of a Supreme Being. "We" atheists see that 'logic' as circular and faulty, while the folks espousing those beliefs appear to make it the be-all/end-all Proof That They're Right.
And you wonder why the "discussion" is fruitile?
:)
And I think the irony of your phrase 'man-made supreme beings' might have escaped you... :)
If you didn't see the irony/humor in that, I'll try to be explicit: from an atheist's point of view, Your God IS a 'man-made Supreme Being,' so complaining that the ones that cultures or cults create, using flesh-and-blood members OF their groups, creating their own Supreme Beings... seems a funny way to put it.
Load more comments...