Way too early.
One can decide when it finally comes down to the very last few. If a person is rational, they may change their premises for very good reasons upon discovering they were wrong -- or right about certain issues.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWi182CM...

Old dino is sick of being forced to vote for some lesser than two evils RINO.
If I'm looking at Sir Jeb of the entitled Royal House of Bush, I'll be voting for whoever is the libertarian or whatever independent may also be available.

Ben was mine until I realized Walker is a consistent winner in a blue state plus being a politician with experience.
I'm now thinking Carson may be a good vice-President.
I may change my mind about both these guys. Plenty of time to evaluate. .

Sorry, Rand Paul. You showed your stuff at the RNC when you ditched your dad to support Romney and thus showed your ABO crap wanting "more of the same". You had the great opportunity to ditch the status quo and you blew it.

Please, I hope you are wrong

The media won't allow Rand to get the nomination. No way, no how. I'd vote for him in a second. Instead, I'll have to choose between Hillary and Jeb. This means I will abstain, again.

I like Rand Paul or Scott Walker. If we get Christie or Jeb little will change.

under your President we have less liberty than before he was elected. teh only people I see got more liberty were illegal aliens. They are also getting earned income credits too, so there's that...
"I say we already had forced insurance, but it wasn't the insured paying for it." I assume you are talking about rising healthcare costs due to uninsured getting free care. However, so far, the numbers do not ber out a savings. People are paying more out of pocket and getting less benefits than they were before ACA passed. some people are in bureaucratic nightmares of having to get new insurance every few months due to the train wreck this legislation has caused. We are all responsible for our votes and you continue to praise the President so I assume you approve of his policies and agenda over all. that would be a reasonable interpretation anyway.

I say we already had forced insurance, but it wasn't the insured paying for it.

Regarding the MORE gov't thing, I don't support the recent proposed increases in spending and taxes. People do not realize we are poised to have a mini-crisis, and it would be much easier to balance the budget now before it becomes a crisis.

You keep saying "you voted" as if I created the world I was born into or as if the only righteous thing to do is not work with the major parties. If Obama hadn't been elected president and no third party longshot won, we'd have a Republican president. We could feel righteous about supporting a third-party or boycotting the process, but we'd have less liberty.

yet you voted for a President that promoted MORE government and forced individuals to buy insurance they did not want.

"I would have rather had his father in office."
Yes. I wonder if his father could have won if he had gotten the nomination. I have this dream that someone like him will appear who can sell the idea of less gov't, not just less gov't in areas their supporters don't like anyone but all around gov't spending/doing less.

I like Ben. He is a great person but he's not my choice.

Ben Carson as well.

Me too!

Right now I'd take any one or two of those three

I wish I thought he was the solution to our problem but I don't. I like him but feel he has been in office too long and has learned to play the political game. Personally would have rather had his father in office. I think he was way better for the average person than the media gave him credit for. Too late for that now. I would much rather see Ted Cruz, Scott Walker or Alan West.