"In the interest of National Security", no.

21st century US elections: Two wolves and a sheep deciding who's for dinner.

But it's the DemRep party Republican wing's turn to be the POTUS for 8 years!

Where is that skeptic, Zero? Has some Republican taken over Zero's account? (grin)
If Rice runs as a GOP candidate, she will have been 'vetted'. That means she will be guaranteed to serve the party masters and will not serve the sovereign people. She is part of the problem, not part pf the solution. As long as you continue to accept the enemy of liberty as the defender of liberty the result will be more dictatorship. There is no excuse for the actions that Rice has taken as a part of 'nation building' and 'spreading democracy.' None of it was in the interest of individual liberty. Rice is as much a big government looter as Clinton.

No, voters do not get to choose who is running for national office. There is a 'show' put on to give the appearance of a 'race', but the media is used to prevent any uncontrollable candidate from surviving. The system is completely rigged and no 'conservatives' are allowed to run in the DemRep party. You are arguing to accept the candidates that the party bosses prefer regardless of whether they will represent the sovereign people. If you continue to consent to this 'system' you will continue to get candidates that do not deserve to be candidates.
Instead of offereing a rational argument you just argue that no one knows what a neocon is? You are conceding the game to the looters by accepting their doublespeak methods.

I'd vote for Rice in a heartbeat.

I'll take an intelligent woman with a stong foreign poicy right now. I'm pretty sure she's fiscally conservative, too - isn't she?

Being a strong black woman doesn't hurt our cause either - refuting the claim about how racist we all are.

A person doesn't have to be perfect to be the better choice. And being a "conservative" isn't even on my check list.

She won't run though. She's too smart to throw herself into that meat grinder.

See my comment to gaiagal. Hillary has not been on this planet for the last 20 years, she is special, she is destined to sit on the throne and no one can stop her. That was why she served the lord Obamanation. She wanted to be second if not first. I wouldn't put it past her dumb ass to try blackface to pull in that segment of the flock. But she will get elected, no matter what. The system will see to it.

Because the power elite belive that the rules do not apply to them, when their messes become apparent, they just lie till they die, and all goes away. With no functional media,(remember, this was all revealed by a HACKER for gods sake), we are well and truely screwed. The sheep will not hold the shepard accountable for the losses overnight, all part of the overhead.

As I've often said, Herb... it used to be "Follow the Money."
I believe that has evolved into "Follow the Power, Money and Desire to Control Others."
I think that covers most of the motivations for a vast majority of 'public servants' and 'elected officials.'

oh, crap....

Condi was on the BOD of HP when Carly (republican, conservative) was Downsizing HP To Success... and failed.

I have zero respect for either of them in terms of their business acumen. And I do want someone with Business Smarts in the Big Chair in the WH. I believe neither of them are qualified.

imnsho

Shouldn't we be able to get all the emails from the NSA? As far as I know their blanket collection activities are still going on.

Exactly what I've been trying to say but never found the right words like you have. Now if we could just find a solution, a cure for this madness before we go down for the third time. Hillary will be the third time.

I was referring more towards the members of the Congress, whose very job is the oversight of this foolishness, although I was also referring to the rabid followers of the woman. It's all OK because she and Bill are such champions of woman's issues.

Whoops. Glad you corrected me

Yes, it was about Rice. I have no use for any of the people mentioned. Goldwater was a conservative. A conservative would have resigned rather than serve in the neo-con regime that Rice was a part of. If Rice had been a conservative she would not have been allowed to serve by that neo-con regime. Rice is even more of a danger than Clinton because some people have the mistaken opinion that she is conservative.
However, neither Rice nor Clinton are worthy of service in any respectable republic.

The Law on this is CRYSTAL CLEAR!!!

MS Hillary was breaking the law. For reference here are some of the CLEAR LAWS and Regulations on Government Emails.
http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bul...

8. Under what circumstances may employees remove records and documentary materials from Government custody?
1.Employees must not remove Federal records from Government custody without proper authorization. Under 36 CFR 1222.24, agencies must develop procedures to ensure that departing employees do not remove Federal records.

9. What does an agency do if there is an unauthorized removal of records?
If an agency knows of any actual or potential threat to records (e.g., removal, alteration, or destruction), it must contact NARA as required by 44 U.S.C. 2905 & 3106 and 36 CFR 1230.14. NARA will assist the agency in the recovery of any unlawfully removed records, including contacting the Attorney General, if necessary. It is also important to follow all agency internal reporting requirements, which may include reporting the threat to the agency's legal counsel and to its Inspector General.

This is just a few, there are hundreds more she broke, but hey, how many federal laws must you clearly and arrogantly violate before your prosecuted?

Let us see, Democrat, can violate as many as they see fit. Not Democrat can violate NOTHING and will be held to the letter of the law, "Ignorance is no excuse."

Is it something in the air that causes those in government to evolve into royalty? In other parts of the world it wasn't so starkly evident as in the USA because of the by the people, of the people and for the people heritage.

Hillary@fullashit.com

Salty dog, I think there is tons of outrage. I think most people who work for a living are absolutely furious. Man, if we could just channel this anger to fix our republic

She meant Hillary, who has earned many expletives

Just ask Dr. ferris

I would also go along with Rice rather than
Hilarious Hillary - any time!

Curious as to why so many, when making an argument, proffer others-have-done-the-same-thing as if it means something other than others have done the same thing. Pointing out that others, in the past, have done something similar and may, or may not, have gotten away with it has no bearing on whether or not a person/administration is behaving correctly or incorrectly at the present time.