15

The EPA teams up with UC to regulate your grill

Posted by Non_mooching_artist 10 years, 1 month ago to Legislation
140 comments | Share | Flag

A match made in crony hell, if I ever saw one. I was actually not surprised in the least when I read which university was getting the grant to fund this utterly ridiculous waste of money study to limit how I enjoy cooking my food. Btw, because there isn't natural gas available where I live, my stove is operated using propane... Is that getting scrutinized soon, I wonder??

When are the representatives, who supposedly have our backs, going to finally deal with the EPA in an aggressive manner of defunding their punitive projects?? Because enough is enough!
I WILL NOT COMPLY!


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 6.
  • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    This is exactly the problem. The agenda driven drones at the EPA, with the carte blanche blessing of this administration are taking over the daily life of all of us. The blatant overreach of the government is unprecedented since the inception of the USA. This is like living under soviet rule! I say ENOUGH!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 1 month ago
    They don't understand. The burning grease adds a particular and critical flavor to the meat - just like burning good apple or hickory chips will do.

    I say we let them light my grill. With a short stick and gasoline.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago
    This is another attempt at control, and has nothing to do with pollution, I think. I find it similar to the law that bans building new fireplaces and forbids using existing ones (CA - Bay Area). There are modestly priced catalytic units that can be put in the chimneys of fireplaces and wood burning stoves...but this would allow people to have a back up source of heat and cooking. So the presence of these devices is not addressed: what is forbidden is independence.

    A loophole has been found! People can barbeque in their back yards! So now a 'study' (with a foregone conclusion) is going to be undertaken and this activity will be forbidden - for our own good, of course.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 10 years, 1 month ago
    As Orren Boyle said when the John Galt line had its first successful run- (paraphrasing)- Their success gives us the tools to bring them down.

    It took awhile for me to realize what this meant- but through taxes and fees, we feed the very government monster that regulates us. Now, I resent sending ANY money to our government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 1 month ago
    the bigger picture is the encroachment on the daily lives of citizens of the USA. eliminating the epa is necessary since they have non-thinking individuals who believe they can do anything they want especially now that the current top dope in charge is encouraging them to do what ever they can to disrupt the daily lives of the citizens.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 1 month ago
    This seems like yet another case of gov't trying to apply the same rules everywhere. Maybe there are a few very densly populated urban areas where this is a problem. I could easily see those communities creating an ordinance. The Fed gov't, though, seems inclined to having the same rules everywhere.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 10 years, 1 month ago
    Thank goodness the EPA is finally doing something about it! Why I can't think of anything that could be more harmful or create a bigger problem for climate change than a juicy porterhouse out back on the Weber! Further, they went to the right place to get help! Who could be more objective about all of this that UC?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • 11
    Posted by khalling 10 years, 1 month ago
    This is eerily similar to the other study monitoring hotel shower durations
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo