

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
* Iran wants to have an informal agreement, (in reality, no agreement)
* Iran does not want any of it to be public,
* Iran will not allow verification,
* For this all sanctions will be lifted.
I interpret this to say:
Iran will put on a public charade so Obama (a.k.a. Neville Chamberlain incarnate) can crow "Peace in our time!" and lift sanctions on a government that is sworn to promote and support terrorism.
I would love to have someone who knows how to play chess negotiating for us. Iran (Persia) is where the game was invented and they are VERY good at remembering past mistakes and thinking seven moves ahead.
At least I (a supply clerk) who stayed in the Carolinas) did not have to fight in that one particular war I did not believe in.
A lot of Marines who joined to fight came back disillusioned and had turned against it too.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WeNBspJGVk...