

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
I've learned over long experience to simply say, "Don't tell me, show me."
He seems to have developed his style deliberately, just when we need the opposite: someone who can lead with rational explanation.
That is the creepiness he is exuding, despite the fact that behind it he is an intelligent man who understands and supports Constitutional principles better than most of them, but you have to wonder if he is stable and consistent enough to credibly act on them.
If those guys are the best our opponents can come up with to rule the world, I won't lose any sleep over them.
(I'm undecided whether Soros is any smarter than they or not. At least Soros has the brains to keep his mouth shut about his plans, most of the time.)
I can't see Cruz being a communist stooge, though. He's not smart enough to hide an agenda like that.
As far as the banksters, I don't support everything bankers now do. But there are good and bad ways to regulate them, and the Democrats have been doing it badly. I would repeal Dodd-Frank, with its unaccountable board, if the Supreme Court doesn't do it first (but they probably will).
Both parties pay lip service to religion but generally don't embrace an evangelicalism like a demagogic preacher.
He is campaigning to be the "lesser" of two EVILs.
Communists do export their own you know. To spread the ideology. I stand on my view: he is a stooge. I have no doubt he's also a member of the CFR ~ the organization that's had a death grip on the WH since FDR and it hasn't changed since.
You could argue Pres Reagan wasn't in the CFR and that may be true, but his ENTIRE staff were all CFR members, thus Reagan was effectively controlled.
Do I get to cut people's heads off?
Look out for those fanatical Christians everyone!
They will purge you of your sins!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AscpkPTq...
WH creep=in=Chief?
The statistics don't support each other.
He's still a Republican. Hillary is still a Democrat. Figure it out for yourself.
If he were nominated to the Supreme Court and started emphasizing religion instead of the Constitution it would be a big problem for a lot of people.
If I was running for POTUS, I would avoid all mention of religion because I think it has little to do with doing the job of POTUS. I would concentrate on actions demonstrating that I acted in a way that proved I could be trusted to do the job of POTUS. Part of that would be to prove my ethics and my philosophy. That philosophy would either prove or disprove my acceptability to someone who is religious. If being the same religion as a voter is the most important criteria to a voter then that voter would not be the target for my ad.
Clearly I will not be selected by the GOP as their candidate in this timeline.
Load more comments...