20

How Prophetic Was 'Atlas Shrugged'

Posted by Zenphamy 10 years ago to Philosophy
165 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

I received this e-mail a couple of days ago. How similar does it strike you as the owner's of John Galt's employer, The 20th Century Motor Co. that caused him to shrug, or remind you of James Taggert? Note the use of the words, 'equal and livable wage', and 'Champion of Change'.

"The White House, Washington
Hi,

I'm Randy, the founder of the Red Hen Baking Company in Middlesex, Vermont.

Our 42 employees are the core of everything we do -- the heart of Red Hen. That is why my wife Liza and I insist on providing paid sick days, an equal and livable wage, health coverage, and other benefits that help everyone balance the work they love with the life they lead. Through these workplace policies, we know we're making our employees more secure, our bakery more productive, and our business more profitable.

It's common sense -- plain and simple. That's why I'm so excited and honored to be at the White House today as a "Champion of Change" for working families. I'll be joining President Obama, Secretary of Labor Tom Perez, and other champions of workplace policies to talk about how crucial they are to building a stronger business. This is too important of an issue for anyone to sit on the sidelines. So you should join us, too.

Watch live at the White House today starting at 12:15 p.m. ET to hear what ordinary people are doing to make an extraordinary difference for America's hardworking men and women.

You can join in on the conversation using the hashtag #WorkingFamilyChamps. Whether you're an employer, an employee, a working mom or dad, or brand new to the workforce, your voice can help lift up the challenges millions of working families face and the solutions that will make a difference.

So I'll hope you'll join us live and be a champion for your employees, coworkers, or your community by standing up for common-sense workplace policies.

Because the bottom line is this: Employees that are happy at work perform better. Focusing on policies that make sense for working families has paid dividends for our business. There's no reason more companies across the country can't do the same thing and realize those benefits.

If you have thoughts, I'd love to hear them. I hope you'll join the conversation today.

Thanks,

Randy

Randy George
Middlesex, Vermont"

Can you point to other predictions from AS that are real today?


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • -3
    Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    It sounds altruistic, but it's not. It's not equal pay for everyone. It's finding ways to move things around to satisfy customers, investors, employees, and vendors. It's about *serving others*, not under the threat of a gun but the offer of money or other things to trade.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Fish 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    OK, I missed the word "equal" which I don't believe it is true anyway.

    There is no conflict between the interest of the owners and the interest of the workers. That conflict is the very base for socialism and many capitalists wrongly bought it.

    Frederick Taylor wrote one book, published in 1911. He said there that all he wanted to show is how the conflict between high wages and low cost was just apparent. The rest of the book and his methods were developed to eliminate that conflict (by the way, those methods are wrong in the majority of cases). Of course nobody remembers that of Taylor, only the study of time and movements.

    So, yes, I agree with you: equal is nonsense and I repeat I don't believe it is the case even when that Randy declares it. The important point is caring about employees is in direct interest of the owners, and was reflected on the quote that I offered previously.

    When *the others* say sensible things, I prefer to praise them for those rather than smash them for the rest of it. And agreeing on the objective, then we can discuss alternatives of actions.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    "The idea of giving people things they want," Sounds pretty altruistic to me. Your choice of language betrays your collectivism. What is wrong with the idea of value for value. Equal pay for everyone doesn't sound like value for value.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    It's progressive, collectivist nonsense talk. There is no manufacturing type business in which every individual is paid equal to every other that can hope to be successful. A bakery has to have a tremendous amount of clean up, broom sweeping type of work. Is that janitor getting equal pay to the guy/gal out making sales calls/servicing existing clients every day?

    This has nothing to do with Republican/Democrat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Personally, I think it was much more than just what she experienced from the USSR, I think she was genius personified.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Care for the employees? By giving everyone EQUAL pay? It'd be very hard for me to believe that out of 42 employees, that they're all giving equal value for work done.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Propagandists are pretty good at sounding reasonable. What does EQUAL pay for 42 employees say to you? Does that include the janitorial staff? How about the once per day cleaning staff, or the forklift driver compared to the accountant, etc?

    Even in 'shrug' land, everyone's work doesn't deserve equal pay. Value for value??
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Do you really think they're doing this for self interest?

    "that help everyone balance the work they love with the life they lead." and 'an EQUAL and livable wage" doesn't strike me as capitalistic. Equal to what or who, all the other 42 workers, equal to the owners? And if everyone is paid equal, what incentive is there for workers to improve or be more productive?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for checking them out. Portland and Seattle make a lot of sense as havens for progressive liberals. I wonder how much they've donated to the collectivist, in one form or the other?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    BeenThere, I haven't read much of you're commenting before. That was an excellent description. Thank you.

    But what do you think of parallels of today that seem so well fitted to her fictional characters and actions?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Conscious, as you say. But to have an actual email show up in my box with that business owner, the purposes proposed, and the words used--it was much like deja vu for a moment. Was I reading the book again, or was this reality?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years ago in reply to this comment.
    She was, but to see an email like that from the White House, with that kind of nonsense propaganda that immediately brought to mind, characters and language from AS--well.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo