I am being sarcastic in respect to the situation.

Yes A and E has no more and no less right and no more right that any other person and business. If one look how the mainstream media and government is playing it it seem A and E has every right to decide what service to provide or not i.e to dump Phil Robertson (I do not t see the ACLU calling for legal action against A and E), but the bakers, according to the government and various activist, do not have the same rights.
Sometime my humor is the only way to deal with a huge hypocrisy .

Thumbs down for illogical thinking. $$ A and E Network has the same right $$ - no more and no less. If you have an interesting and new definition of "rights" please explain them. If not, then by the three or four common definitions, you are just plain wrong. Ayn Rand cut to the core when she defined a right as "that for which you do not need to ask permission."

Wedding cake bakers who discriminate against gays are idiots. Objectivism does hope to lift the individual against such irrational behavior, even as it grants the libertarian explanation of why you have a political right to be a moron.

According to Objectivism, we try to elevate ourselves above that, even as we grant your political right to be stupid.