"If any private business said “I won’t serve a customer because of his race or sexual orientation,” would that decision be allowed by government?" (Well we know from the Colorado Baker case that the answer is a big fat no) "Would Hollywood or the media elite take the business owner’s side? Of course not. So “private property rights” are extended only to people with the same views as Hollywood?" (when speaking of Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson and the A&E decision to suspend him).

Why is it the Left/Liberals can't seem to get the contradiction even when pointed out? Is it pride? Anyone have any other glaring examples of contradictory policy coming from the mouths of Liberals?