What does any one know about this?
Got a rather lengthy e-mail from a friend of mine with these links embedded. (Hope you got them):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O_Sbbeq...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPIsjH25...
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/05/robert_r...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/k...
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/18...
From the import of the discussions, apparently the thrust of the legislation is to usher the UN Agenda 21 provisions onto the US. Does anyone have any thoughts? Frankly, it scares the pee-waddling crap out of me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O_Sbbeq...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPIsjH25...
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/05/robert_r...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/k...
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/03...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/18...
From the import of the discussions, apparently the thrust of the legislation is to usher the UN Agenda 21 provisions onto the US. Does anyone have any thoughts? Frankly, it scares the pee-waddling crap out of me.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Jan
kleenex, or something on a roll, to them. -- j
.
the formula for Coke -- cannot be good. . the u.s.
sovereignty aspects are the worst, imho. -- j
.
Caldwell, Ayn Rand, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and others. It's not a time to be scared; it's a time to prepare and act!
Our liberal leaders are all for our having no property rights, and it has zero to do with environmentalism. Ultimately, we will lose our property, food will be in short supply (as farms are taken over), no cars, as no place to keep them in inner city apartments without parking lots, it includes plans to control reproduction rights, every aspect of our lives.
It is not one big law pushed on us, that would be easier to fight. No, it is NGOs, trained by UN personnel, to go in and influence and sell the piece by piece zoning changes, tax changes, and city planning to individual towns. Yet most, as in our town, have no idea what Agenda 21 even is. Our poll here showed only one public official had heard of it, yet did not know what it was. Yet they had sought grants which were part of the implementation, their websites referred people to Agenda 21 friendly planning sites they called "favorites:. It is like an oozing cancer which comes into a community piece by piece via planning commissions, heath depts, until local government agencies, until the rights are gone and the restrictions and cost of private property ownership are beyond the reach of the common working man. The Obamas and Clintons will still have their mansions, but the farmers and the workmen will not. They are getting wise to hiding their old terms of "population density" and "smart growth", but look out for them or their idea without the labels, as they are coming for you.
Whatever Obama is for has to be for has to be guano for what is left of the Founding Fathers' USA. .
Great links by the way.
I don't know the details, does anyone outside the beltway? Based on Obama's record I find it hard to believe USA doesn't end up with our hands tied behind our backs over resources usage and environmental controls. I think Obama's #1 mission is to somehow equalize the differences between US and third world countries, so that all can have an equal share of the prosperity (or misery). If a trade agreement can move the ball in that direction, then Obama will use all of the Reagan style language he can read from a teleprompter to reach his end goal.
Why Reich and Krugman are against it? The agreement must not punish the US as much as they would like.
The problem is the secrecy of the deal and Congress surrendering fast track to Obama.
Trade should be free, except when it conflicts with vital national security interests. And, America should NEVER bow to the rule international courts.
Bottom line, yet again the DC ruling class is governing from on high, and we apparently have no ability to influence it... The Constitution has become nothing more than just another historical document.
(AS audio book helps, too.)
or
"I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude."
used by Jefferson.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.