No, because there is objective right and wrong. Your position would have us believe that George Washington and Bin Laden were both freedom fighters, based on a subjective set of values, which is patent nonsense.

Secular Progressives. A part of using carefully selected court cases to cause change in the Constitution with Amendments by, primarily, the ACLU. (Example is the Massachusetts suit that pointed out the state had not defined marriage as between man and women to a very liberal Judge - then spread to other states and recently the same sex marriage controversy in Tennessee.) 2005 was the year of court cases against Christmas displays or use of the word in a number of jurisdictions nation wide. Proponent funders George Soros and offshore based billionaire investment banker and Peter Lewis the billionaire CEO of Progressive Insrance and George Lakoff (knows as the Yoda of the SP movement a Berkely UC California Professor though we thought it insulting to Yoda so changed his name to Grinch.)

Together they fund and guide MoveOn, Open Society Institute and the ACLU - the left wing extremists. You will see some posts here from time to time from their adherents all in the same pattern dictated by the Lakoff book Frame The Debate. Easy to spot by refusal to answer questions and constantly changing the question and the constant hammering of the same theme. Their right to legally buy elections through targeting areas and campaigns with soft money came out as I have the right without explanation to all take all of your rights without exception.

The non-existent right was countered by listing five or six existing rights at which point the SP disappeared and has never returned - at least under that name. They do not handle direct confrontation nor facts well and rely on the Big Lie technique more often that not.... Two of their acolytes are Comrade Nancy Pelosillyni promoter of the tax on embedded tax VAT system and Comrade Wicked Witch of the Left Hillary Clinton with her enhanced tax system and most of the left wing of the leftist Government Party. (Democrats and cave in a second bi-partisan members of the Republican Party.) Soros stated goal is forced confiscation of wealth in excess of 50 million except for his own which is kept in an offshore bank. That is the start point.

(I personally define the left as those who believe in and practice government control of citizens as opposed to citizen control of government and consider the Republicans to be the right wing OF the left. A manufactured condition by moving the signpost marked Center to the center of the left as opposed to it's proper position as the center of USA political thought the Constitution. Easier to understand what they really do in Washington DC as opposed to what they say or said they were going to do. i do not accept their twisted definitions nor their propaganda but consider left and right to be those who support government control of citizens and citizen control of governments as the two opposing factions.As far as Soros, Lewis, and Lakoff I would define them as enemies domestic in my personal opinion.)


Short version to your question.

Same thing as a civilian target. Refer you to Carlos Marighella and the Cycle of Repression. Season Six I believe of 24 rapidly showed the system in action by the fast changing targets making it difficult to protect everything all of the time. When applied by a government the Cycle of Repression (for example the economic cycle of the left) is even more effective than when applied by some small underfunded revolutionary group. The target and methods in both cases are the same. Terrorize innocent bystanders with a purpose of showing they are not being protected thus inviting more and more - permanently temporary -suspensions of civil liberties. Prime Example today the Patriot Act.

I think you're confusing my post with another who actually thought Hitler was a catholic. I know he was NOT. I'm well aware of Hitler's disdain for Christianity and his abolition of it from the public square.

So gunpowder and the printing press are examples of Christian armies committing wasteful slaughter??? When in the last 100, or even 200, years have Christian armies gone to war to slaughter innocents?

You would be well served to read Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Einstein, and other great minds of science to learn of how science puts us closer to God rather than your little Festinger.
The religion of the Nazis was Nazism. Hitler banned Christianity from the public square and had an intense hatred for it.

Except Mao, Stalin, Kim Jong, and countless other atheists are responsible for millions more deaths than Judeo-Christians.
The reason is simple... it's antithetical to the teachings of Christ.

To start, we DESTROY Isis. We allow Israel free reign. We announce to Iran that if they continue those that harm America or our allies, we will crush them.
We defeat them just as we did the Nazis and the Japanese. We don't want war, because it's awful and runs counter to our beliefs, but if evil will not not surrender, it must be vanished.

Why is the overwhelming terrorism committed today coming from radical Islam??? You not see to coming from Judeo-Christians against Islam, period.

It's not just that Islam is stuck 900 years ago and wants the rest of the world there, too. Islam hasn't experienced a reformation and joined modernity, because it can't.
There's a reason why there aren't examples of Christian armies slaughtering innocents. It's because it's antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
By contrast, jihad is a core principle of Islam.
Attempting to establish a moral equivelance argument is dangerously naive.