This is how a Republican does something for free
This is our governor's plan to provide free secondary education provided to students graduating high school in Tennessee without costing the taxpayers anything!
Now, I know there are a couple of people on this site that like to legislate morality, so not everyone will like it, but I think it is great!
Now, I know there are a couple of people on this site that like to legislate morality, so not everyone will like it, but I think it is great!
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
Government interference in the payment of higher education has been the principle cause for the astronomical increase in costs. If the governor truly wanted to benefit his state, he'd eliminate all government funding of post secondary education, and provide a tax credit for all persons aged 18-24 to be used in whatever way they choose.
Morality doesn't have to devolve into a religious discussion, but since religion primarily deals with morality, it tends to drift that way quickly.
They could do that by building more "public" buildings they don't need or by giving themselves raises they have not deserved. Their proposed solution is to give kids a education. Could the money be spent elsewhere? Yep. That's why he is proposing this, s their citizens can talk about it.
BTW, the roads in TN are some of the best in the country. The school system ranks pretty high. Their public health program is efficient and effective, I have a niece who is a special needs child and the help the state has offered her and the family is remarkable in scope and vale to the "client".
If these things weren't in order I'd suggest they have other priorities, but they seem to be making things work, which is a far cry from my own state of IL which is a total mess.
I am also not the judge of what is and is not moral. My statement was more of a disclaimer that you and another member might object and say everyone in the state was now on a freight train bound for hell because of it. I attempting to forestall this turning into a religious debate like so many other topics have lately.
say it ain 't so that you buy those heinous scratch offs. If there 's two things I hate it is 1. paying for fuel inside and 2. Being behind a customer buying those damn things and making me wait!
Also, as pointed out here by FreedomForAll, governments just waste what moneys (and resources) they do have. That is a deeper issue. Governments do not make ECONOMIC decisions; they make POLITICAL decisions, which of necessity are malinvestments.
(On the side issue of law and law enforcement, we make the one exception for the one task for which the government does have a moral mandate.)
The explosion in government funding of education has not raised the salaries of professors or created more jobs for them; we do not have more and better college libraries, certainly. It is the ADMINISTRATIONS that have benefited... no surprise there...
"evil"? Why, khalling... that's a religious term.
You may not like such legislation, but, objectively, it can be neither pious nor evil.
I "choose" to gamble. My gambling addiction leads me to gamble away my paycheck, repeatedly, so my wife and children end up starving and/or on the street. Yeah, that never happens; gambling never hurt nobody.
Well, guess what? I'm not opposed to gambling, but to pretend that it doesn't ever harm anyone besides the one who gambles is naive in the extreme. Like alcohol, illicit drugs or any other addiction. Your hypocrisy lies in the "morality" label.
I figured there would be a couple of people on here that would curse the lottery as a form of gambling and blame all the rot in society on it. The might then scream that it should be banned, and anyone who ever bought a ticket be drawn and quartered, racked, burned at the stake, gassed, drugged, and finally shot.
How many students do you have that graduate from high school who cannot go to college today?
What is your high school dropout rate?
What about students who transfer into Tenn from other states?
If a majority of your students manage to go to college without your assistance, I'd say you just don't need to go there. Also if your high-school dropout rate is higher than the national average, I'd say you need to spend money getting kids to reach for THT golden ring. Treating students from your state in one way - by giving them a free education, yet treating transfer students as second class by charging them much more will cost you state more than just money, brain power will stay away.
Load more comments...