

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
You mention an ideal world though. I think that a lot of governments right now and in the past have forced the issue, such as money redistribution policies against your will. This helped caused my misconception.
I have been trying to figure out why that philosophy came out in my comment. I can only assume that it is both a remnant of what everyday society teaches and my own observations of our current government.
It amazes me how hard it is to remove implicit cultural lessons.....
said that the increases in productivity which result from the
complementary specialization he described make everyone
richer -- William learns to do software better and the farmer learns
to do cattle better, so that everyone can have more of each,
with higher quality!!! . this means that William and the farmer
both get richer, so that they can afford to sponsor others
who are learning how to do houses or clothing or tools or
cars or cruise ships better. . they can sponsor the poor
through their chosen charities, or directly. . they can afford
more, and others benefit from it. . capitalism is the way
that humans make everyone richer simultaneously. -- john
.
A modern economy is much more sophisticated of course. I often marvel at the fact that as I spend my day sitting at a my computer writing software someone is raising a cow so that I can have a steak as a result. He's better at raising cows than I am and I'm better at software. We will probably never meet, of course, but our money will.
Your rebuttal intrigues me though. I am checking my premises. Does it only stem from producers making more from what they are given or did you have other arguments to consider ?
"Boomalay boom on the big bass drum,
Where is the money coming from?
It's used in research, children dear,
For ways to increase the tax next year."
---Ogden Nash
into the shallow end, keeping about half for themselves .......
this helps the depth of the pool increase. . sure! -- j
.
If I was not seeing this in print and I guess on tv news I would think it was a bad joke but it is real and there is nothing that our sensible population is doing about it. They are just not going to their respective representatives and telling them enough is enough. The end result IS going to be that these muslims will not look for employment because they have been given "PERMANENT RESIDENCE" according to the article. The change the homeboy talked about IS going to take place over the next 50 years and unless there is some sort of uprising the country will no longer exist as we currently know it.
To heck with Colonel Sanders anyway. Let's hear from The Man who studied for 8 whole years to be president under the (up until now) biggest spender of all time--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9puG...
Load more comments...