Gulch Live: Radio Interrupted 09.18.2015

Posted by GaltsGulch 9 years, 7 months ago to The Gulch: Live
98 comments | Share | Flag

Links from the show...
The Geneh War - Near Future Science Fiction with a Philosophical Flavour
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...

Net Step and Civic Sports
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...

How To Be a Rocket Scientist - or succeed like one
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...

- - - - - -

Radio Interrupted is a live show. During showtime, 1PM - 2PM ET, please participate in the real-time conversation on the Gulch Activity Feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...

HOW IT WORKS:
1. At 1PM ET, go to the Gulch Activity feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...
2. At the top, you'll see a "Gulch Live" box.
3. Type your comment, submit, and poof, your comment will be automatically injected into the stream - along with everyone else's comments as well.

NOTE
- For the best experience, post your comments in the Activity Feed. If you post your comments here, you'll not see the live stream responses and things might get a little confusing.
- When addressing someone on the feed, consider using @membername to address them directly or no one will no who you're talking to.
- All comments submitted to the feed will automatically be added to this post.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 4.
  • Posted by hurc81 9 years, 7 months ago
    Hey Rick, when you get a minute shout out to Christina again - she was listening to yesterday's show and didn't hear you!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 7 months ago
    The "under the jurisdiction of" clause excludes only people who are not subject to US law while here. For example, diplomats
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 7 months ago
    @techno. No it does not. If you are here when you give biryh you are "under the jurisdiction"
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 7 months ago
    The ONLY Scotus decision ever on this issue was in the 1800's and said that the 14th amendment clearly covers what are now called anchor babies
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 7 months ago
    Anchor babies violate the jurisdictional clause of the fourteenth amendment
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by hurc81 9 years, 7 months ago
    Hi Rich. I don't comment much because I am actually working :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 7 months ago
    GHBs. I am OUT today. This is anti-Objectivist, anti-reason.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 9 years, 7 months ago
    Mexico is not entirely third world. Second world really. At least what I have seen.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 7 months ago
    "concessions for cheap labor" how is this an Objectivist view on people?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 7 months ago
    how do you know what "they" want? where is this collective thinking coming from? why is it on the Gulch?!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by hurc81 9 years, 7 months ago
    EUD - MAKE SURE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR NEW LISTENER!
    Christina from Virginia
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo