Black mobs terrorize Victoria’s Secret shoppers

Posted by lukenbocker 11 years, 2 months ago to News
244 comments | Share | Flag

I think we need to stop naming kids DaQuan and ShaT'qua. We also need to spend more time with our kids and love them and make sure that God and Jesus are first in our lives.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 5.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Maphesdus 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have no personal objections to discussing God or religion, as long as it's done a peaceful and respectful manner. >_>/
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I disagree. I'd say an original Gutenberg is better. The closer to the source material, the better the Bible.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Do you believe in equality? Do you believe in "natural rights"?

    Guess you're not open minded, then.

    I'm going to tell you something people don't seem to say much...

    IT'S HIS UNIVERSE. If it amuses Him to stake us out on anthills... there's not a damned thing you can do about it.

    Among Christians, it's generally believed that children, being innocent, do make it to heaven. It's also why most Christians try to get their children baptized as early as possible.

    "Original Sin" is why we're here and not in the Garden of Eden. Look around. This life you love so much and want to make the most of. This is the world of free will, self-determination, responsibility for one's actions.

    THIS is what children have been condemned to for Original Sin.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    BECAUSE SOME OBJECTIVISTS WORSHIP AYN RAND WHILE OTHERS WORSHIP OBJECTIVISM AND STILL OTHERS WORSHIP THEMSELVES.

    That answer your question?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    But there are many who believe that if it's not theirs they have every right to touch it. Not only touch it, but take it.
    You might not like it, and might not believe that that is moral, but that doesn't change the reality of things.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree with everything you say, except I think "no choice" and "forced" are too extreme. You can say we make it hard for them, but don't actually "force" people to lean on the state. Some people find a way out of it, despite the bad policy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Things like the Binding of Issac and the weird stuff with rape and incest are just bizarre, at least to someone like me not knowledgeable about.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What does that have to do with anything? Are you saying that free, intelligent people cannot have different views of the existence of life?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Can't it be unthinking, irrational, AND help people agree on what's good and bad. Making stuff up might help people come to agreement on values. It doesn't make the made-up stuff right. That's argument from final consequences.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    LOL. It reminds me of other internet discussions that have nothing to do with politics, and suddenly people start arguing about President Obama.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What makes people happy, gives a feeling of superiority, and gets them through the day has nothing to do with what's true.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    open mindedness does not include believing in myths. That pushes an irrational morality. T\Christianity is immoral on its face. To condemn a child to Original Sin is the very definition of moral bankruptcy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sometimes religion inspires people to do good. Either way, to me it seems like they're making stuff up. Even if the final consequence of making stuff up is good, it doesn't make it true.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Actually it is, particularly for altruist, such as those who believe in religion.

    The link be morality and religion is absurd. Christianity is immoral on its face. To condemn a child to Original Sin is the very definition of moral bankruptcy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That is a recipe for disaster and going back to the dark ages.

    The link be morality and religion is absurd. Christianity is immoral on its face. To condemn a child to Original Sin is the very definition of moral bankruptcy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dbhalling 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The link be morality and religion is absurd. Christianity is immoral on its face. To condemn a child to Original Sin is the very definition of moral bankruptcy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't know what you're looking to ask. But if you're looking to create a scenario that many would say isn't wrong, and are there some that would say that it is wrong (or vice versa), then yes, I do agree. There have been people killed for merely touching someone else's things (car for example). You might not like that, but it's true.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo