All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 5 months ago
    There is no good reason.

    A fence of this length is a waste of resources and ineffective as the Chinese and the French found out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by GaryL 9 years, 5 months ago
    I doubt that fences on either side are the answers! Enforcement of the laws and close scrutiny of those allowed to visit here seems a much better plan along with our military patrolling our borders and doing the job of our federal government, Protecting our borders! Given a choice I am sure our soldiers would much rather be in the deserts of TX and NM and AZ than in Iraq, Afghanistan or any other Middle East country.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 9 years, 5 months ago
    In the age of terrorism, building a fence on both borders is the order of the day, especially in an age of political correctness, where one can't call a spade a spade.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 5 months ago
    We've already had one terrorist intercepted crossing the border with Canada, who was intending to bomb LAX, and the Times Square bomber came from Canada. Navigable roads are harder to find on the Northern border, but given a few more incursions by terrorists, and expect to hear a call for more security there as well.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ CBJ 9 years, 5 months ago
    If things keep going downhill in the U.S., the Canadians may want to build one.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo