Non-Participation And Decentralization As Primers For Revolution

Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 1 month ago to Politics
2 comments | Share | Flag

Non-Participation

This is a simple concept that for some reason tends to confound people. If you march to the steps of the White House motivated by a desire to educate others on the hidden dangers of our political situation, then this is all well and good. But, if you march to the steps of the White House with the expectation that this gesture will somehow impress or frighten the military industrial complex into forsaking its criminal ways and step down from power, then you have fallen into a delusional paradigm.

If you are using a government controlled communications medium like the internet to educate others while the system still exists, then this is practical. But, if you really believe that you are going to exploit that same network as an offensive tool to destroy Big Brother, you are living in techno-geek dreamland.

Decentralization is about dissolving our unbalanced relationship with the state and taking away their power to dictate how we live. If a core necessity is centralized in the hands of a select few, then we start producing it ourselves and remove that option from their deck of cards. You cannot fight a corrupt system if you are dependent on a corrupt system.
SOURCE URL: http://www.alt-market.com/articles/1990-non-participation-and-decentralization-as-primers-for-revolution


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 1 month ago
    Thanks for posting this. I agree with almost everything it says. I wouldn't call it non-participation. It actually sounds like participation, participation in a positive way. I agree US gov't has a corruption problem, but I would agree with the author's recommendation for self-reliance even if we had an ideal gov't.

    I don't agree with the part about blaming the banking system. We could have corruption regardless how of we finance things and exchange goods. If the monetary and banking system disappeared, a new one would appear b/c people want a medium of exchange and they want a way to store value and direct it to worthwhile projects, i.e. they want a banking and investment system.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 11 years, 1 month ago
      I blame the banking system as it exists because it is designed (by bankers) to concentrate power in the hands of a few bankers. I agree that another banking system must replace it, but it must be designed to limit power and I think decentralizatioin should be at the heart of the system. For example, having a single currency would be very convenient for trade, but a more direct path to tyranny. Having credit creation (solely by a cartel of bankers) as the centerpiece (and the method of money creation) of the banking system is a certain path to default and tyranny.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo