

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Other than the price of lumber has gone through the roofs I fail to see the difference between siimply controlled cutting here or encouraging uncontrolled cutting there. Except the foreign delivery ship crews all have jobs...Ours only works during wars and guess what...the cost is government subsidized
As to the cost that's heavily based on regulatory expenses and the long delay in licensing. We need to streamline that process and the cost will come down.
And, of course, Thorium looks good we need to develop that for broader application.
they do not generate CO2, an invaluable plant food which supports vegetation and hence all animal life,
they cost more per kWh than gas, coal and oil fired plants.
Advantages are that they generate dependably round the clock in contrast to wind and solar which are subject to wind/daylight and are unreliable even then, and are so expensive they need government subsidy to construct and operate.