11

Introducing John Allison, Libertarian, Objectivist, a man for our times?

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 4 months ago to Politics
37 comments | Share | Flag

http://fee.org/freeman/curing-our-lea...

I've been calling him George Allison here and there by mistake. The former President of the BB&T Bank who had all of his 30,000 employees read Economics In One Lesson by Hazlitt and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand as a condition of employee training and ran the bank into perhaps the one success story of that industry using Randian principles. I'm off to order his books at present, There are two and I didn't spare the pennies using Amazon Prime for faster delivery - but here's a section of the interview which addresses the often argued place of subjective thought in an objective world.

“Objectivity” in this context simply means making logical decisions based on the facts of reality. Obviously, in many situations, we do not have all the facts, nor can we necessarily integrate all the factors that might impact the outcome. So there is a subjective (subconscious and nonmathematical) component based on past experiences that can be part of objective decision making.

However, the dictionary defines subjective as based on personal feelings, taste, and opinions. While there are some individuals who can be successful decision makers because their subconscious integrations are naturally logical, this type of mind is rare. Making decisions on personal, subjective whims often leads to disaster."

Mr. Allison is a former board member of Ayn Rand Institute and at present the President of the Cato Institutes and head of their Economics and Finance Area.

So far I'm impressed and wondering why i don't see his name suggested as a Candidate for much higher office and worthy of support by a wide range of anti-socialist thinkers and doers.

Question: Why are we not seeing people of this caliber instead of the dregs and leavings of the current two faced cesspool of failure? Are we that much in thralldom to the present system of despair with only the excrement of Rinos and Dinos from which to choose?

Professional Biography

https://en.wikipedia.or/wiki/John_A._Allison_IV


All Comments

  • Posted by xthinker88 9 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    That in a nutshell is the problem. We are mixed any time anybody does not share our dogma 100%. So we end up with Hillary Clinton running against Donald Trump. Or Wesley Mouch's wife vs. Orren Boyle.

    I said this before. Objectivists could never have founded the United States. That took smart charismatic leaders of principle who recognized that they could not ever get everything they wanted in any society of men.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Donald-Brian-Lehoux 9 years, 4 months ago
    You have a choice now, a veteran.DIVIDE AND CONQUER is what they do.
    Vote veteran someone that puts America before ANY party.
    No double standards put DC politicians on Obamacare and SS.Thanks for your support and vote.Pass the word. mrpresident2016.com
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank You... Some said they thought Brook ought to run for office too but found out he's not a citizen.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by coaldigger 9 years, 4 months ago
    One of the problems "we" have as Objectivists is that since "we" reached our beliefs by independent, individual, rational thinking, "we" know the only version of "the truth". john Allison's "The Financial Crisis a nd the Free Market cure" and Yaron Brook and Don Watkins' "Free Market Revolution" represent some of the most practical thinking around. I would take their good start and go from there AND they are actually making an effort to communicate these ideas to a large audience and not just critiquing others on the same team.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's sorta like that line for an upcoming movie, "Inspired by true events." That's a CYA if ever there was one.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 4 months ago
    It appears you're asking why we're not seeing men like this in politics. That area of endeavor is not a very rewarding field for an Objective thinker or producer. Why would one want to get in that cesspool?

    But all of that aside, Allison has a problem separating subjective from subconscious and understanding that there's a big difference,particularly in relationship to objective decisions or analysis.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ditto. Its a looters business with no product unless you consider inflation, war, and misery as "products." He could have been naive when he started, but imo he could not have risen to be CEO unless he left his principles far behind. Now, who knows? Does he suddenly have principles? Cato isn't objectivist either. I think Rand's name is being sullied by the looters who claim to have been "influenced" by her work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He hasn't been there for a number of years. I was wondering first of all what it was like when he was there and second wha'ts it like now. So that's half the question and thank you.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and...it's a bank.
    Just like other banks, there is no interest to speak of on savings, but they do have interest free checking provided you have a certain amount in the form of a CD or Money Market, which is the same racket as other banks. They get to use your money while paying virtually nothing to you for the privilege. If Allison's banking practices are any different, I haven't detected them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed. What should be cautioned against is being content to make decisions based on the facts of the past when confronted with new information. And you are correct in that a true Objectivist would only be interested in the truth of Reality as it is and not necessarily as it was.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think that Hillary's appeal is that she can be bought and give favors. Her $15/hr wage would kill my company unless I can switch production somehow to china, or maybe mexico. We would have to lay off half of our workers to stay afloat. I guess this is just Atlas Shrugged being played out in real time. At least Trump wouldnt kill off business.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Months earlier I was tooting my horn about not voting for the least of two evils this time around.
    Now I'm thinking anyone would be way better than that lying snake..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As I recall he made that connection and limited it to a very very few people then stated it mostly was a cause of problems the technique was if a decision had to be made and the objective analysis information had run out 'some very few' could switch to a subjective evaluation but most could not.

    As for being limited only to finance and banking what else? In his business they had people that specialized in the various other forms of endeavor. Some of them probably knew the difference between a four leg and three leg pig!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    We do not need to be omniscient, but we should be aware of the potential for ignorance and false premises to creep into decision-making. We should never be complacent and satisfied with the little knowledge we have.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 4 months ago
    "Question: Why are we not seeing people of this caliber...?"

    Because a long-term viewpoint is required. There are very few people in the world who can take a thoughtful, over-arching approach to decision-making. And many of those are easily influenced by friends or distracted by technology. [SQUIRREL]

    It is a rare person indeed who is grounded in reality to the point that their convictions determine their course of action.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by tdechaine 9 years, 4 months ago
    It appears he erred in mixing subjective with subconscious.
    The subconscious is programmed by the conscious mind. If objective all the time, the subconscious cannot hold subjective thoughts.
    Objectivity does not require omniscience. One only needs to rely only on facts as we know them at any point in time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think the country has turned in a bad direction to elect Obama twice. Now to see Hillary advancing in the polls is very disturbing. I want anyone but Hillary. I am going to vote for Trump- at least he isnt politically correct and just tells it like it is for a change. He would upend the political scene for 4 years and run the country like a business for a change.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I lived through Jimmy Carter. At least that one-termer received his due voter reaction.
    Carter lost by a landslide.
    The far worse Obama? A freaking reelection!
    The thought of the so obviously corrupt Broom Hillary following in the Presidebt's wake makes my stomach turn.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 4 months ago
    We know about Mr. Allison. We have accounts with BB&T. Or as we refer to it, "BIBIT.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo